Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071877›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2021

Evidence synthesis summary formats for clinical guideline development group members: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.

Melissa K Sharp, Barrie Tyner, Dayang Anis Binti Awang Baki, Cormac Farrell, Declan Devane, Kamal R Mahtani, Susan M Smith, Michelle O'Neill, Máirín Ryan, Barbara Clyne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Melissa K SharpHealth Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice,, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5261-1573
Barrie TynerHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-5331
Dayang Anis Binti Awang BakiSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Cormac FarrellHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Declan DevaneSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9393-7075
Kamal R MahtaniNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7791-8552
Susan M SmithHealth Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice,, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6027-2727
Michelle O'NeillHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Máirín RyanHealth Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.
Barbara ClyneHealth Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice,, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

communicationevidence summariesmixed-methods systematic reviewpresentation of findingssummary of findings table

Identifiers

PMID36071877
PMCPMC9433911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.