SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2022
Effect of ranibizumab on retinopathy of prematurity: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Ranibizumab in Patients with Treatment-Naïve Retinopathy of Prematurity.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Construction of a nomogram model to predict the risk of retinopathy of prematurity reactivate after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Recurrence risk factors of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy in retinopathy of prematurity: a retrospective study at one center.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab injection in the treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in infants. The MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, China Biology Medicine disc, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data, CNKI, and CQVIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of ranibizumab with laser treatment in ROP. The retrieval time was from 2007, on which ranibizumab was approved until 12 January 2022. Data were extracted based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two investigators employed QUADAS-2 to independently assess the quality of all eligible original studies. Following quality evaluation, we also performed a meta-analysis using STATA v 15.1 and RevMan v 5.4 and funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. A total of five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. In this study, the regression rate of retinal neovascularization was used as the index of therapeutic effectiveness. According to the results, the retinal neovascularization regression rate of the intravitreal ranibizumab injection group was statistically higher than that of the laser therapy group [risk ratio (RR) = 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-1.35]; however, the incidence of adverse events, including recurrence and complications, was not different between them (RR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.19-2.80). Therefore, intravitreal ranibizumab injection may be more clinically effective than laser therapy in the treatment for ROP. The safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in the long-term treatment for ROP needs further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.