Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071784›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Development of a universal thoracic enhanced recover after surgery protocol for implementation across a diverse multi-hospital health system.

Adam R Dyas, Alyson D Kelleher, Crystal J Erickson, Jennifer A Voss, Ethan U Cumbler, Anne Lambert-Kerzner, Annette S Vizena, Celisse Robinson-Chavez, Brandi L Kee, Alison R Barker and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Editorial: Women in thoracic surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Adam R DyasSurgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Alyson D KelleherDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Anschutz Medical Campus. Aurora, CO, USA.
Crystal J EricksonDepartment of Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central. Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Jennifer A VossDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Anschutz Medical Campus. Aurora, CO, USA.
Ethan U CumblerDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Anschutz Medical Campus. Aurora, CO, USA.
Anne Lambert-KerznerSurgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Annette S VizenaDepartment of Anesthesiology, UCHealth Poudre Valley Hospital. Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Celisse Robinson-ChavezDepartment of Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central. Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Brandi L KeeDepartment of Anesthesiology, UCHealth Poudre Valley Hospital. Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Alison R BarkerDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Anschutz Medical Campus. Aurora, CO, USA.
Melissa S FullerDepartment of Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central. Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Susan A MillerDepartment of Surgery, UCHealth Medical Center of the Rockies. Loveland, CO, USA.
Katherine O McCabeDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Anschutz Medical Campus. Aurora, CO, USA.
Katharine M CookDepartment of Anesthesiology, UCHealth Poudre Valley Hospital. Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Simran K RandhawaDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Anschutz Medical Campus. Aurora, CO, USA.
John D MitchellDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Anschutz Medical Campus. Aurora, CO, USA.
Robert A MeguidSurgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways for patients undergoing anatomic lung resection have been reported at individual institutions. We hypothesized that an ERAS pathway can be successfully implemented across a large healthcare system including different types of hospital settings (academic, academic-affiliated, community). Methods: An expert panel with representation from each hospital within a healthcare system was convened to establish a thoracic ERAS pathway for patients undergoing anatomic lung resection and to develop tools and analytics to ensure consistent application. The protocol was translated into an order set and pathway within the electronic health record (EHR). Iterative implementation was performed with recording of the processes involved. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were recorded. Results: Development and implementation of the protocol took 13 months from conception to rollout. Considerable change management was needed for consensus and incorporation into practice. Facilitators of change included peer accountability, incorporating ERAS care elements into the EHR, and conducting case reviews with timely feedback on protocol deviations. Barriers included institutional cultural differences, agreement in defining mindful deviation from the ERAS protocol, lack of access to specific coded data, and resource scarcity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Support from the hospital system's executive leadership and institutional commitment to quality improvement helped overcome barriers and maintain momentum. Conclusions: Development and implementation of a health-system wide thoracic ERAS protocol for anatomic lung resections across a six-hospital health system requires a multidisciplinary team approach. Barriers can be overcome though multidisciplinary team engagement and executive leadership support.

Indexed as

dissemination and implementationenhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)Thoracic enhanced recovery after surgery (thoracic ERAS)

Identifiers

PMID36071784
PMCPMC9442517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.