ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Futile lobectomies following video-thoracoscopic exploration for indeterminate pulmonary nodules: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06215326 (Short-term Effects of Preoperative Exercise in Moderate-to-high Perioperative Risk Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Short-term Effects of Preoperative Exercise in Moderate-to-high Perioperative Risk Lung Cancer Patients(PRE-EXELUCA): a Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- First Experiences with Ultrasound-Guided Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of Small Pulmonary Nodules Using One-Lung Flooding: A Brief Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Factors associated with overdiagnosis of benign pulmonary nodules as malignancy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Need for preoperative marking of pulmonary nodules and a more useful technique.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer screening is correlated with an increase in detection of small indeterminate pulmonary nodules and these nodules often require operative resection to obtain the diagnosis. In suspected early-stage lung cancer, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become the preferred option. In this context of minimally invasive surgery, diagnostic wedge resection is sometimes difficult to perform for small deep impalpable nodules. So, our purpose was to determine whether performing VATS for indeterminate pulmonary nodule increases the risk of lobectomy for benign lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out in our center from January 2013 to January 2019 on patients who underwent resection for a solitary pulmonary nodule suspicious for cancer. Resection method, frozen section analysis, post-operative outcomes, operative and pathology reports were reviewed. Results: Six hundred fifty-one patients underwent surgical exploration for a solitary pulmonary nodule. Thirty hundred and forty-five patients underwent VATS and 306 patients underwent thoracotomy. Patients in the VATS group underwent significantly more wedge resections (P=0.012) and diagnosis of lung cancer was significantly more frequent in the thoracotomy group (P<0.001). One hundred and thirty-two patients (38.3%) in the VATS group and 60 patients (19.6%) in the thoracotomy group underwent lobectomy without frozen section analysis of the pulmonary nodule. There was no significant difference in terms of lobectomy performed for a benign lesion between the two groups. Conclusions: VATS was associated with a higher rate of benign lesion resection but was not associated with a higher rate of lobectomies for benign lesion in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.