Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071760›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Phrenic nerve stimulation in an ovine model with temporary removable pacing leads.

Harry Etienne, Martin Dres, Julie Piquet, Laure Wingertsmann, Olivier Thibaudeau, Thomas Similowski, Jesus Gonzalez-Bermejo, Jalal Assouad

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Diaphragm Neurostimulation Assisted Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harry EtienneExperimental and Clinical Respiratory Neurophysiology, INSERM, UMRS1158, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Martin DresExperimental and Clinical Respiratory Neurophysiology, INSERM, UMRS1158, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Julie PiquetSurgical Research Laboratory, Carpentier Foundation, Paris, France.
Laure WingertsmannPathology Platform, INSERM, UMRS1152, Paris, France.
Olivier ThibaudeauPathology Platform, INSERM, UMRS1152, Paris, France.
Thomas SimilowskiExperimental and Clinical Respiratory Neurophysiology, INSERM, UMRS1158, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Jesus Gonzalez-BermejoExperimental and Clinical Respiratory Neurophysiology, INSERM, UMRS1158, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Jalal AssouadExperimental and Clinical Respiratory Neurophysiology, INSERM, UMRS1158, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel, removable, surgically implanted, temporary neurostimulation approach involving the distal portion of the phrenic nerve. Methods: Temporary phrenic nerve pacing electrodes were implanted surgically using an ovine model (4 animals). The primary endpoint was the ability to successfully match the animal's minute-ventilation upon implantation of both phrenic nerve pacers on day 1. Secondary endpoints were successful phrenic neurostimulation by both electrodes 15 and 30 days after initial implantation. We also assessed safe removal of the electrodes at 15 and 30 days after implementation. Results: In 3 of 4 animals, electrodes were successfully implanted in both right and left phrenic nerves. On day 1, median ventilation-minute induced by neurostimulation was not significantly different from baseline ventilation-minute [4.9 L·min Conclusions: Efficient temporary neurostimulation through the distal portion of the phrenic nerve was possible at baseline. The main complication was the displacement of electrodes on the right phrenic nerve on two occasions, which was due to the anatomy of the ovine model. It compromised diaphragm pacing on day 15 and day 30. The electrodes could be safely removed percutaneously without damage to the phrenic nerves.

Indexed as

ovine modelphrenic nerveTemporary neurostimulation

Identifiers

PMID36071760
PMCPMC9442545
OpenAlexW4286354401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.