Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071727›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Patient and Provider Experience in Real-Time Telemedicine Consultations for Pediatric Ophthalmology.

Carly Stewart, Josephine Coffey-Sandoval, Erik A Souverein, Tiffany C Ho, Thomas C Lee, Sudha Nallasamy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carly StewartThe Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Josephine Coffey-SandovalThe Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Erik A SouvereinKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4836-8918
Tiffany C HoThe Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Thomas C LeeThe Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sudha NallasamyThe Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5316-1129
University of Southern California · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Telemedicine adoption hinges on positive experiences for patients and providers. We report participants' experience from our prospective study. Patients and Methods: Ophthalmic examinations for children 0-17 years of age were conducted by an optometrist using digital exam instruments and streamed to an ophthalmologist. The ophthalmologist, optometrist, parent, and patient (≥10 years) completed surveys capturing patient and provider experience outcomes. Results: Three hundred forty-eight examinations were conducted with 210 patients in a hospital-based pediatric ophthalmology clinic. About 99% of parents were comfortable with exam quality, and 97% indicated they would have another telemedicine examination. Fifty-four of 55 consented for surgery during the initial telemedicine examination. Thirty-seven percent of families traveled ≥2 hours round-trip to their appointment; 1/3 of parents and patients missed a full day of work/school. Video glasses were by far the most useful instrument, while technical proficiency was most challenging with the digital indirect ophthalmoscope. Problem-focused examinations took 33 minutes of the ophthalmologist's time on average. Equipment challenges caused delays in 40/348 (11.5%) of visits, with the majority lasting 5-10 minutes. In a few cases, a backup device was used. Despite seeing significantly fewer patients on telemedicine days, the ophthalmologist's surgical volume increased 25%. Conclusion: All participants were satisfied with telemedicine visits despite longer durations and learning curve. Results indicate an opportunity for telemedicine in community settings to improve access to specialized care. Telemedicine enabled the optometrist to manage or co-manage more complex patients with a pipeline to the ophthalmologist for surgical cases. In the right setting, collaborative telemedicine consultations may be beneficial to one's practice.

Indexed as

patient experienceprovider experiencereal-time teleophthalmologysynchronous tele-ophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID36071727
PMCPMC9444028
OpenAlexW4294325693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.