Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071692›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2023

No differences between adults with and without autism in audiovisual synchrony perception.

Ricarda F Weiland, Tinca Jc Polderman, Dirk Ja Smit, Sander Begeer, Erik Van der Burg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. When 2 become 1: Autistic simultaneity judgements about asynchronous audiovisual speech.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricarda F WeilandVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2677-9086
Tinca Jc PoldermanVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5564-301X
Dirk Ja SmitAmsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Sander BegeerVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0572-6893
Erik Van der BurgUniversity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lay abstractIt has been known for a long time that individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder perceive the world differently. In this study, we investigated how people with or without autism perceive visual and auditory information. We know that an auditory and a visual stimulus do not have to be perfectly synchronous for us to perceive them as synchronous: first, when the two are within a certain time window (temporal binding window), the brain will tell us that they are synchronous. Second, the brain can also adapt quickly to audiovisual asynchronies (rapid recalibration). Although previous studies have shown that people with autism spectrum disorder have different temporal binding windows, and less rapid recalibration, we did not find these differences in our study. However, we did find that both processes develop over age, and since previous studies tested only young people (children, adolescents, and young adults), and we tested adults from 18 to 55 years, this might explain the different findings. In the end, there might be quite a complex story, where people with and without autism spectrum disorder perceive the world differently, even dependent on how old they are.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderAdolescentAuditory PerceptionChildHumansPhotic StimulationTime FactorsVisual PerceptionYoung Adultautismmultisensorypredictive processingrapid temporal recalibrationtemporal binding

Identifiers

PMID36071692
PMCPMC10115936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.