Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071608›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2022

"This has definitely opened the doors": Provider perceptions of patient experiences with telemedicine for contraception in Illinois.

Bonnie Song, Angel Boulware, Zarina Jaffer Wong, Iris Huang, Amy K Whitaker, Lee Hasselbacher, Debra Stulberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bonnie SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California/LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Angel BoulwareDepartment of Comparative Human Development, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Zarina Jaffer WongDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Iris HuangPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Amy K WhitakerPlanned Parenthood of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lee HasselbacherCenter for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health (Ci3), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Debra StulbergDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Chicago · USLAC+USC Medical Center · USPlanned Parenthood · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe COVID-19 pandemic increased the provision of contraception through telemedicine. This qualitative study describes provider perceptions of how telemedicine provision of contraception has impacted patient care.

methodsWe interviewed 40 obstetrics-gynecology and family medicine physicians, midwives, nurse practitioners, and support staff providing contraception via telemedicine in practices across Illinois, including Planned Parenthood of Illinois (PPIL) health centers. We analyzed interview content to identify themes around the perceived impact of telemedicine implementation on contraception access, contraceptive counseling, patient privacy, and provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

resultsParticipants perceived that telemedicine implementation improved care by increasing contraception access, increasing focus on counseling while reducing bias, and allowing easier method switching. Participants thought disparities in telemedicine usage and limitations to the technological interface presented barriers to patient care. Participants' perceptions of how telemedicine implementation impacts patient privacy and LARC provision were mixed. Some participants found telemedicine implementation enhanced privacy, while others felt unable to ensure privacy in a virtual space. Participants found telemedicine modalities useful for counseling patients considering methods of LARC, but they sometimes presented an unnecessary extra step for those sure about receiving one at a practice offering same day insertion.

conclusionProviders felt telemedicine provision of contraception positively impacted patient care. Improvements to counseling and easier access to method switching suggest that telemedicine implementation may help reduce contraceptive coercion. Our findings highlight the need to integrate LARC care with telemedicine workflows, improve patient privacy protections, and promote equitable access to all telemedicine modalities.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineContraceptionContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansPandemicsPatient Outcome AssessmentPregnancyContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID36071608
PMCPMC9826464
OpenAlexW4294991515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.