ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2022
Patient-identified priorities for successful partnerships in patient-oriented research.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- EXCEL-Punjabi: the process of using a community based participatory research approach for a culturally-tailored exercise oncology intervention.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Article
- Considerations for engaging in patient-oriented research with injured workers.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- 'Motivating Implicit Chinese to Express Themselves Is the Biggest Barrier': A Qualitative Study of Chinese Researchers' Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Patient Engagement in Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Key ingredients for successful collaboration in health research: perspectives of patient research partners.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- An Evaluation of Racial and Ethnic Representation in Research Conducted with Young Adults Diagnosed with Cancer: Challenges and Considerations for Building More Equitable and Inclusive Research Practices.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Observational
- Acceptability of automatic referrals to supportive and palliative care by patients living with advanced lung cancer: qualitative interviews and a co-design process.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Collaborating with patients and caregivers to create web-based educational resources for people affected by cirrhosis.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Working together in health research: a mixed-methods patient engagement evaluation.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Co-building a training programme to facilitate patient, family and community partnership on research grants: A patient-oriented research project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Determining the benefits and drawbacks of parents using personal connections and social networks for recruitment in research projects: a qualitative study.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Co-learning commentary: a patient partner perspective in mental health care research.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Albertans4HealthResearch, supported by the Alberta Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Patient Engagement Team, hosted a virtual round table discussion to develop a list of considerations for successful partnerships in patient-oriented research. The group, which consists of active patient partners across the Canadian province of Alberta and some research staff engaged in patient-oriented research, considered advice for academic researchers on how to best partner with patients and community members on health research projects. The group identified four main themes, aligned with the national strategy for patient-oriented research (SPOR) patient engagement framework, highlighting important considerations for researchers from the patient perspective, providing practical ways to implement SPOR's key principles: inclusiveness, support, mutual respect, and co-building. This commentary considers the process behind this engagement exercise and offers advice directly from active patient research partners on how to fulfill the operational patient engagement mandate. Academic research teams can use this guidance when considering how to work together with patient partners and community members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.