Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071456›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2022

The effect of micro-learning on learning and self-efficacy of nursing students: an interventional study.

Ladan Zarshenas, Manoosh Mehrabi, Leila Karamdar, Mohammad Hasan Keshavarzi, Zahra Keshtkaran

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06693232 (The Effect of Mobile Micro-learning on Critical Care Nurses' Self-confidence, Motivation, and Stress After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
30.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06693232 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Mobile Micro-learning on Critical Care Nurses' Self-confidence, Motivation, and Stress After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamanhour UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsCardiopulmonary Arrest, Nurse's RoleArmsMobile micro-learning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ladan ZarshenasCommunity Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Manoosh MehrabiDepartment of E-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School, Center of Excellence for e-learning in Medical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Leila KaramdarClinical Education Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Hasan KeshavarziClinical Education Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. keshavarzi20014@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-1171
Zahra KeshtkaranNursing Department, Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the present age, e-learning has been playing a good role in educational and clinical settings along with face-to-face training. This study aimed to determine the effect of distance class using micro-learning contents on learning outcomes and self-efficacy in the clinical education of nursing students in 2021.

methodsThis research is a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test study conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The study population consisted of 46 nursing students who were recruited by the full census method. Students were randomly divided into two groups of intervention and control. Before and after educational interventions in both groups, students' learning and self-efficacy were evaluated using a questionnaire. Data Analysis was done using descriptive and analytical statistical methods and with SPSS software version 23.

resultsThe results revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean score of clinical learning level of nursing students between the control and experimental groups after the intervention (p = 0.041). Also, the difference between the mean score of self-efficacy in the intervention group before and after the training was statistically significant (p = 0.001).

conclusionMicro-learning is an effective training method for raising learning outcomes and self-efficacy among nursing students, especially in internship units. This method is recommended since multimedia pays attention to all learning styles of learners and affects the learning outcomes and self-efficacy of learners.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateSelf EfficacyStudents, NursingHumansLearningSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical educationE-learningMicrolearningMultimediaSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID36071456
PMCPMC9450813
OpenAlexW4294904505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.