ArticleBMC health services research2022
The influence factors of medical disputes in Shanghai and implications - from the perspective of doctor, patient and disease.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual attitudes toward doctors: the role of shared decision-making and empathy in frustrated medical treatment in a randomized trial.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Effect of situational simulation teaching combined with the AIDET framework on communication skills training for oncology residents.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Combination of mentor-based and resident-based learning may benefit to improving the ability of clinical practice in resident training.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Association of occupational burnout and perceived healthcare service quality with medical disputes among physicians and medical technicians: a cross-sectional study in China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Causes, Characteristics, and Risk Factors of Medical Damage Liability Disputes: A 13-Year Retrospective Analysis of 1761 Litigation Cases in Chongqing, China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Causes of medical disputes in China and Japan from physicians' perspectives: a qualitative study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- A risk prediction model for medical conflict in emergency departments.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Qualitative phenomenological exploration of lived experiences and perspectives of Chinese hospital administrators engaged in medical dispute management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of the causes of improper medical decision-making in medical damage liability disputes in China: a text mining approach.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Research on the impact of hospital organizational behavior on physicians'patient-centered care.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- The association between clinicians' legal literacy and the service quality of primary healthcare - evidence from the Greater Bay Area study, China.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Factors influencing medical disputes among village doctors from seven provinces in China: a cross-sectional study.Human resources for health · 2025Article
- National Patient Satisfaction Survey as a Predictor for Quality of Care and Quality Improvement - Experience and Practice.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Doctors should choose communication strategies based on the patient's attitude toward disease and healthcare workers: a study in Jiangsu, China.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Reflections from Chinese and Japanese Physicians on Medical Disputes.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- Study on medical dispute prediction model and its clinical-application effectiveness based on machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Impact Analysis of COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospital Reviews on Dianping Website in Shanghai, China: Empirical Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Risk management and empirical study of the doctor-patient relationship: based on 1790 litigation cases of medical damage liability disputes in China.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Attitudes toward communication skills with learner needs assessment within radiology residency programs in China: a cross-sectional survey.BMC research notes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the causes and factors behind medical disputes that occurred across eight hospitals in Shanghai over a three-year period (January 2018 to December 2020), thus providing targeted suggestions for amelioration.
methodsStratified sampling was employed to collect 561 cases in which medical disputes occurred at two tertiary hospitals, two secondary hospitals, and four primary hospitals in Shanghai. The causes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while the factors affecting the dispute level (i.e., 1 through 4, with 1 being most severe) were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and logistic regression analyses.
resultsDoctors and patients variously contributed to the medical disputes; 86.1% were related to doctors, while 13.9% were related to patients. For doctors, there are seventeen factors that influenced medical disputes. In particular, the insufficient communication (28.82%) is the most prominent factor in the doctors' factors. For patients, there are seven factors that influenced medical disputes. In particular, the misunderstanding of medical behavior (43.48%) is the most prominent factor in the patients' factors. Of all investigated medical disputes, 406 were level 4 (78%), 95 were level 3 (18%), and 19 were level 2 (4%); there were no level 1 disputes. The reasons for different level placements included the disease classification, treatment effect, diagnosis and treatment regulation violations by doctors, and low technical levels.
conclusionsIn addition to strengthening training about clinical and communication skills, the hospitals should establish quality control mechanisms for case records and construct rapid, standardized referral mechanisms. The doctors should attach great importance to the quality and urgency of treatment given to critically ill patients, who must be informed about their prognoses in a timely manner to avoid medical disputes and physical deterioration. The patients should actively cooperate with their doctors in the treatment process, moderate any unrealistic expectations that patients may have about the outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic particularly, doctors and patients should strengthen empathy and mutual trust more, then defeat disease together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.