Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071420›Full record

Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2022

Diaphragmatic ultrasonography-based rapid shallow breathing index for predicting weaning outcome during a pressure support ventilation spontaneous breathing trial.

Jia Song, Zhixian Qian, Haixiang Zhang, Minjia Wang, Yihua Yu, Cong Ye, Weihang Hu, Shijin Gong

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jia Song *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310013, Zhejiang, China.
Zhixian Qian *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Xinchang People's Hospital, No. 117, Gushan Road, Nanming St, Xinchang, 312500, China.
Haixiang ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District, No. 199, Shixin Road, Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, 311203, China.
Minjia WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310013, Zhejiang, China.
Yihua YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310013, Zhejiang, China.
Cong YeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310013, Zhejiang, China.
Weihang HuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310013, Zhejiang, China.
Shijin GongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310013, Zhejiang, China. gsj801@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimum timing to wean is crucial to avoid negative outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients. The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), a widely used weaning index, has limitations in predicting weaning outcomes. By replacing the tidal volume of the RSBI with diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) assessed by ultrasonography, we calculated two weaning indices, the diaphragmatic excursion rapid shallow breathing index (DE-RSBI, respiratory rate [RR]/DE) and the diaphragm thickening fraction rapid shallow breathing index (DTF-RSBI, RR/DTF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive values of DTF-RSBI, DE-RSBI and traditional RSBI in weaning failure.

methodsThis prospective observational study included patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) for > 48 h and who were readied for weaning. During a pressure support ventilation (PSV) spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), right hemidiaphragmatic excursion and DTF were measured by bedside ultrasonography as well as RSBI. Weaning failure was defined as: (1) failing the SBT and (2) SBT success but inability to maintain spontaneous breathing for more than 48 h without noninvasive or invasive ventilation. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used for analyzing the diagnostic accuracy of RSBI, DE-RSBI, and DTF-RSBI.

resultsOf the 110 patients studied, 37 patients (33.6%) failed weaning. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves for RSBI, DE-RSBI, and DTF-RSBI for predicting failed weaning were 0.639, 0.813, and 0.859, respectively. The AUROC curves for DE-RSBI and DTF-RSBI were significantly higher than for RSBI (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively). The best cut-off values for predicting failed weaning were RSBI > 51.2 breaths/min/L, DE-RSBI > 1.38 breaths/min/mm, and DTF-RSBI > 78.1 breaths/min/%.

conclusionsIn this study, two weaning indices determined by bedside ultrasonography, the DE-RSBI (RR/DE) and DTF-RSBI (RR/DTF), were shown to be more accurate than the traditional RSBI (RR/VT) in predicting weaning outcome during a PSV SBT.

Indexed as

DiaphragmVentilator WeaningHumansRespirationRespiration, ArtificialUltrasonographyDiaphragmatic excursionDiaphragmatic ultrasonographyDiaphragm thickening fractionRapid shallow breathingSpontaneous breathing trialWeaning from mechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID36071420
PMCPMC9450260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.