ArticleScientific reports2022
Deep learning-based reconstruction on cardiac CT yields distinct radiomic features compared to iterative and filtered back projection reconstructions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transferability of radiomics models between deep learning and conventional CT reconstruction algorithms: A task-based assessment for stratifying acute pancreatitis severity.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Image Quality Optimization in 60 kVp Head-Neck CTA: A Comparative Study of FBP, ClearView, and ClearInfinity Reconstruction Algorithms.Current medical science · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven radiomics: developing valuable radiomics signatures with the use of artificial intelligence.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Impact of deep learning image reconstruction algorithms on CT radiomic features in patients with liver tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Impact of Emerging Deep Learning-Based MR Image Reconstruction Algorithms on Abdominal MRI Radiomic Features.Journal of computer assisted tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to determine the effects of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) on radiomic features obtained from cardiac computed tomography (CT) by comparing with iterative reconstruction (IR), and filtered back projection (FBP). A total of 284 consecutive patients with 285 cardiac CT scans that were reconstructed with DLR, IR, and FBP, were retrospectively enrolled. Radiomic features were extracted from the left ventricular (LV) myocardium, and from the periprosthetic mass if patients had cardiac valve replacement. Radiomic features of LV myocardium from each reconstruction were compared using a fitting linear mixed model. Radiomics models were developed to diagnose periprosthetic abnormality, and the performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver characteristics curve (AUC). Most radiomic features of LV myocardium (73 of 88) were significantly different in pairwise comparisons between all three reconstruction methods (P < 0.05). The radiomics model on IR exhibited the best diagnostic performance (AUC 0.948, 95% CI 0.880-1), relative to DLR (AUC 0.873, 95% CI 0.735-1) and FBP (AUC 0.875, 95% CI 0.731-1), but these differences did not reach significance (P > 0.05). In conclusion, applying DLR to cardiac CT scans yields radiomic features distinct from those obtained with IR and FBP, implying that feature robustness is not guaranteed when applying DLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.