ArticleScientific reports2022
An innovative model for conductivity of graphene-based system by networked nano-sheets, interphase and tunneling zone.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling the roles of network and tunnels in the conductivity of carbon nanofiber composites.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Label-free electrochemical biosensor based on green-synthesized reduced graphene oxide/FeScientific reports · 2024Article
- Carbon Black Functionalized with Serinol Pyrrole to Replace Silica in Elastomeric Composites.Polymers · 2024Article
- Predicting of tunneling resistivity between adjacent nanosheets in graphene-polymer systems.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Development of a portable smart Glucometer with two electrode bio-electronic test strip patch based on Cu/Au/rGO/PEDOT:PSS.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effect of contact number among graphene nanosheets on the conductivities of tunnels and polymer composites.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Simulating of effective conductivity for grapheme-polymer nanocomposites.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a simple equation for the conductivity of graphene-filled nanocomposites by considering graphene size, amount of filler in the net, interphase deepness, tunneling size, and properties of the net. The amount of nanoparticles in the net is related to the percolation threshold and effective filler content. The novel model is analyzed using the measured conductivity of numerous examples and the factors' impacts on the conductivity. Both experienced data and parametric examinations verify the correctness of the novel model. Among the studied factors, filler amount and interphase deepness implicitly manage the conductivity from 0 to 7 S/m. It is explained that the interphase amount affects the operative quantity of nanofiller, percolation threshold, and amount of nets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.