ArticleScientific reports2022
Deep learning multi-organ segmentation for whole mouse cryo-images including a comparison of 2D and 3D deep networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cryo-imaging provided 3D whole-mouse microscopic color anatomy and fluorescence images that enables biotechnology applications (e.g., stem cells and metastatic cancer). In this report, we compared three methods of organ segmentation: 2D U-Net with 2D-slices and 3D U-Net with either 3D-whole-mouse or 3D-patches. We evaluated the brain, thymus, lung, heart, liver, stomach, spleen, left and right kidney, and bladder. Training with 63 mice, 2D-slices had the best performance, with median Dice scores of > 0.9 and median Hausdorff distances of < 1.2 mm in eightfold cross validation for all organs, except bladder, which is a problem organ due to variable filling and poor contrast. Results were comparable to those for a second analyst on the same data. Regression analyses were performed to fit learning curves, which showed that 2D-slices can succeed with fewer samples. Review and editing of 2D-slices segmentation results reduced human operator time from ~ 2-h to ~ 25-min, with reduced inter-observer variability. As demonstrations, we used organ segmentation to evaluate size changes in liver disease and to quantify the distribution of therapeutic mesenchymal stem cells in organs. With a 48-GB GPU, we determined that extra GPU RAM improved the performance of 3D deep learning because we could train at a higher resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.