Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071086›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Performance of a novel risk model for deep sternal wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Bianca Maria Maglia Orlandi, Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia, Jennifer Loría Sorio, Pedro de Barros E Silva, Marco Antonio Praça Oliveira, Marcelo Arruda Nakazone, Marcos Gradim Tiveron, Valquíria Pelliser Campagnucci, Luiz Augusto Ferreira Lisboa, Jorge Zubelli and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bianca Maria Maglia OrlandiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (INCOR), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Omar Asdrúbal Vilca MejiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (INCOR), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. omar.mejia@incor.usp.br.
Jennifer Loría SorioUniversidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Pedro de Barros E Silva *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Samaritano Paulista, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Antonio Praça Oliveira *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Arruda Nakazone *Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José de Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Gradim Tiveron *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Marília, Marília, São Paulo, Brazil.
Valquíria Pelliser Campagnucci *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Augusto Ferreira LisboaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (INCOR), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge ZubelliKhalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Sharon-Lise NormandDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Fabio Biscegli JateneDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (INCOR), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical prediction models for deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery exist, although they have a poor impact in external validation studies. We developed and validated a new predictive model for 30-day DSWI after CABG (REPINF) and compared it with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons model (STS). The REPINF model was created through a multicenter cohort of adults undergoing CABG surgery (REPLICCAR II Study) database, using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression, internally and externally validated comparing discrimination, calibration in-the-large (CL), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), trained between the new model and the STS PredDeep, a validated model for DSWI after cardiac surgery. In the validation data, c-index = 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.95). Compared to the STS PredDeep, predictions improved by 6.5% (IDI). However, both STS and REPINF had limited calibration. Different populations require independent scoring systems to achieve the best predictive effect. The external validation of REPINF across multiple centers is an important quality improvement tool to generalize the model and to guide healthcare professionals in the prevention of DSWI after CABG surgery.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresSurgical Wound InfectionAdultCoronary Artery BypassHumansRisk FactorsSternum

Identifiers

PMID36071086
PMCPMC9452524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.