Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071061›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Ca

Irene Serra, Julio Esparza, Laura Delgado, Cristina Martín-Monteagudo, Margalida Puigròs, Petar Podlesniy, Ramón Trullás, Marta Navarrete

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Ventral striatal astrocytes contribute to reinforcement learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Astroglial CBGlia · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Astrocytes integrate time and space.Neural regeneration research · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene SerraInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Julio EsparzaInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6397-3094
Laura DelgadoInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Martín-MonteagudoInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6170-0615
Margalida PuigròsInstitute for Biomedical Research of Barcelona, CSIC, CIBERNED, Barcelona, Spain.
Petar PodlesniyInstitute for Biomedical Research of Barcelona, CSIC, CIBERNED, Barcelona, Spain.
Ramón TrullásInstitute for Biomedical Research of Barcelona, CSIC, CIBERNED, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7951-9881
Marta NavarreteInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain. mllinas@cajal.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0003-2097-4788
Instituto Cajal · ESBiomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are key elements of brain circuits that are involved in different aspects of the neuronal physiology relevant to brain functions. Although much effort is being made to understand how the biology of astrocytes affects brain circuits, astrocytic network heterogeneity and plasticity is still poorly defined. Here, we have combined structural and functional imaging of astrocyte activity recorded in mice using the Ca

Indexed as

Basolateral Nuclear ComplexNucleus AccumbensAnimalsAstrocytesHippocampusMiceNeurons

Identifiers

PMID36071061
PMCPMC9452556
OpenAlexW4294898454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.