Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071060›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

A multi-sensor human gait dataset captured through an optical system and inertial measurement units.

Geise Santos, Marcelo Wanderley, Tiago Tavares, Anderson Rocha

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geise SantosUniversity of Campinas, Institute of Computing, Campinas, Brazil. geise.santos@ic.unicamp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-0178-5482
Marcelo WanderleyMcGill, Music Tech, Montreal, Canada.
Tiago TavaresUniversity of Campinas, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Campinas, Brazil.
Anderson RochaUniversity of Campinas, Institute of Computing, Campinas, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology · CA

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education) 88882.160443/2014-01Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation) 2017/12646-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different technologies can acquire data for gait analysis, such as optical systems and inertial measurement units (IMUs). Each technology has its drawbacks and advantages, fitting best to particular applications. The presented multi-sensor human gait dataset comprises synchronized inertial and optical motion data from 25 participants free of lower-limb injuries, aged between 18 and 47 years. A smartphone and a custom micro-controlled device with an IMU were attached to one of the participant's legs to capture accelerometer and gyroscope data, and 42 reflexive markers were taped over the whole body to record three-dimensional trajectories. The trajectories and inertial measurements were simultaneously recorded and synchronized. Participants were instructed to walk on a straight-level walkway at their normal pace. Ten trials for each participant were recorded and pre-processed in each of two sessions, performed on different days. This dataset supports the comparison of gait parameters and properties of inertial and optical capture systems, whereas allows the study of gait characteristics specific for each system.

Indexed as

GaitOptical DevicesAdolescentAdultGait AnalysisHumansLegMiddle AgedWalkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36071060
PMCPMC9452504
OpenAlexW3215310298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.