Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36071038›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Modern groundwater reaches deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems.

Melissa Thaw, Merhawi GebreEgziabher, Jobel Y Villafañe-Pagán, Scott Jasechko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Groundwater quality evolution across China.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  6. New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 10: Water Resources.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa ThawBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, CA, USA.
Merhawi GebreEgziabherBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8273-1792
Jobel Y Villafañe-PagánBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, CA, USA.
Scott JasechkoBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, CA, USA. jasechko@ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-7708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep groundwater is an important source of drinking water, and can be preferable to shallower groundwaters where they are polluted by surface-borne contaminants. Surface-borne contaminants are disproportionately common in 'modern' groundwaters that are made up of precipitation that fell since the ~1950s. Some local-scale studies have suggested that groundwater pumping can draw modern groundwater downward and potentially pollute deep aquifers, but the prevalence of such pumping-induced downwelling at continental scale is not known. Here we analyse thousands of US groundwater tritium measurements to show that modern groundwater tends to reach deeper depths in heavily pumped aquifer systems. These findings imply that groundwater pumping can draw mobile surface-borne pollutants to deeper depths than they would reach in the absence of pumping. We conclude that intensive groundwater pumping can draw recently recharged groundwater deeper into aquifer systems, potentially endangering deep groundwater quality.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterGroundwaterTritiumDrinking WaterTritium

Identifiers

PMID36071038
PMCPMC9452510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.