Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36070961›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2022

Preliminary Experience of the Surpass Streamline Flow Diverter for Large and Giant Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms.

Kosuke Teranishi, Yumiko Mishima, Takahiko Taniguchi, Takashi Fujii, Senshu Nonaka, Takayuki Kitamura, Akihide Kondo, Hidenori Oishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Review of Current Flow Diverters.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kosuke TeranishiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine.
Yumiko MishimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine.
Takahiko TaniguchiDepartment of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine.
Takashi FujiiDepartment of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine.
Senshu NonakaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine.
Takayuki KitamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine.
Akihide KondoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine.
Hidenori OishiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine.
Juntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of January 2021, the Surpass Streamline (SS) is the most recently approved flow diverter in Japan. A total of 28 Japanese patients, including 9 clinical trial patients, with 28 large or giant unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms, underwent SS embolization at Juntendo University Hospital. Procedural failure occurred in two patients due to the difficulty to navigate the device in the tortuous parent artery. Therefore, 26 patients with 26 aneurysms were available for clinical and anatomical assessments. Patients' mean age was 62.6 years (range 46-86), and 24 patients (92.3%) were female. Mean aneurysm size and neck width were 15.4 mm and 7.7 mm, respectively, with 20 saccular and 6 fusiform aneurysms. Seven aneurysms were symptomatic due to the aneurysmal mass effect. Twenty patients underwent a 6-month follow-up angiography to evaluate the degree of occlusion. Anatomical outcomes were 12 (60%) complete occlusion (CO), 4 (20%) residual neck (RN), and 4 (20%) residual aneurysm. Favorable aneurysm occlusion consisted of CO, and RN was achieved in 16 (80.0%). There were no significant device stenoses. Aneurysmal mass effect improved in one and was unchanged in eight patients. There were three device-related complications, namely, delayed aneurysm rupture, minor ischemic stroke, and device occlusion (11.5%). One patient with minor ischemic stroke fully recovered before 30 days, and our series showed 7.7% risk of major ipsilateral stroke and neurological death at 30 days. The SS embolization for large and giant unruptured ICA aneurysms offers satisfactory anatomical and clinical outcomes with a low risk of device-related complications.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery DiseasesEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmIschemic StrokeStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid Artery, InternalClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomeflow diverterinternal carotid artery aneurysmJapanese populationsurpass streamline

Identifiers

PMID36070961
PMCPMC9637403
OpenAlexW4294877870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.