Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36070875›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2022

Registered nurses' perceptions of their career-An interview study.

Hanna Kallio, Mari Kangasniemi, Marja Hult

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanna KallioDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-9646
Mari KangasniemiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Marja HultDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-5914

Funding

Finnish Nursing Education FoundationFinnish Work Environment Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe aim to explore registered nurses' perceptions of their career.

backgroundCareer development options have been found to increase attraction to nursing and support nurses' engagement with their organization and profession.

methodsWe collected qualitative individual interviews with 23 registered nurses; data were analysed with thematic analysis and reported according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) criteria.

resultsThree themes emerged: career choices, career engagement and career development. Participants had chosen a nursing career because they perceived it as humane, people oriented, meaningful, diverse and secure work. Participants' engagement in their career was connected to the content of the work, in which direct patient care was central. Nurses connected career development with high competency, independence, influence and meaningful working life experience. However, they perceived career development opportunities as minute within direct patient care.

conclusionsCareer development opportunities for nurses in direct patient care are needed to foster their career engagement and the attractiveness of the nursing profession. Further research is needed on the career planning and development of nurses working in patient care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers must play a central role in engaging nurses in their careers and promoting their competency and career planning and development in organizations.

Indexed as

Nurse AdministratorsNursesCareer ChoiceHumansQualitative Researchcareerqualitative researchregistered nursesworking life

Identifiers

PMID36070875
PMCPMC10087756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.