Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36070622›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2023

Aerosol precautions and airway complications: a national prospective multicentre cohort study.

T Potter, J N Cronin, J Kua, E Nurmi, D J N Wong, I Ahmad, T M Cook, K El-Boghdadly, AeroComp Trainee Research Networks, Collaborators

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

T PotterDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8056-0360
J N CroninDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-3591
J KuaSurgical Outcomes Research Centre, University College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5741-2300
E NurmiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
D J N WongDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-1766
I AhmadDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-7040
T M CookDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3654-497X
K El-BoghdadlyDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-717X
AeroComp Trainee Research Networks
Collaborators
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBLocal Initiatives Support Corporation · USUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

AmbuEdwards LifesciencesFisher and Paykel HealthcareGE Healthcare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perceived risk of transmission of aerosolised viral particles from patients to airway practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the widespread use of aerosol precautions, including personal protective equipment and modifications to anaesthetic technique. The risk of these aerosol precautions on peri-operative airway complications has not been assessed outside of simulation studies. This prospective, national, multicentre cohort study aimed to quantify this risk. Adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective or emergency procedures over a 96-hour period were included. Data collected included use of aerosol precautions by the airway practitioner, airway complications and potential confounding variables. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the risk of individual aerosol precautions on overall and specific airway complications. Data from 5905 patients from 70 hospital sites were included. The rate of airway complications was 10.0% (95%CI 9.2-10.8%). Use of filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators was associated with an increased risk of airway complications (odds ratio 1.38, 95%CI 1.04-1.83), predominantly due to an association with difficult facemask ventilation (odds ratio 1.68, 95%CI 1.09-2.61) and desaturation on pulse oximetry (odds ratio 2.39, 95%CI 1.26-4.54). Use of goggles, powered air-purifying respirators, long-sleeved gowns, double gloves and videolaryngoscopy were not associated with any alteration in the risk of airway complications. Overall, the use of filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators was associated with an increased risk of airway complications, but most aerosol precautions used during the COVID-19 pandemic were not.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCohort StudiesHumansProspective Studiesaerosol precautionsairway complicationsCOVID-19intubation

Identifiers

PMID36070622
PMCPMC10087829
OpenAlexW4294990873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.