Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36070574›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2022

Diversity in spatial frequency, temporal frequency, and speed tuning across mouse visual cortical areas and layers.

Helen Wang, Oyshi Dey, Willian N Lagos, Edward M Callaway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen WangSystems Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2345-3892
Oyshi DeySystems Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Willian N LagosSystems Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Edward M CallawaySystems Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-5267

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007198 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHI, NEIL C, INSEL, PAUL A · 1985 to 2024
$29.3M
Organization and Function of Visual Cortical Feedback SystemsR01EY022577 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI EDWARD M CALLAWAY · 2012 to 2026
$8.0M
Contribution of parallel inputs to speed tuning in higher visual cortexF30EY029932 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WANG, HELEN · 2020 to 2022
$132k
NEI NIH HHS F30 EY029932NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022577NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse visual system consists of several visual cortical areas thought to be specialized for different visual features and/or tasks. Previous studies have revealed differences between primary visual cortex (V1) and other higher visual areas, namely, anterolateral (AL) and posteromedial (PM), and their tuning preferences for spatial and temporal frequency. However, these differences have primarily been characterized using methods that are biased toward superficial layers of cortex, such as two-photon calcium imaging. Fewer studies have investigated cell types in deeper layers of these areas and their tuning preferences. Because superficial versus deep-layer neurons and different types of deep-layer neurons are known to have different feedforward and feedback inputs and outputs, comparing the tuning preferences of these groups is important for understanding cortical visual information processing. In this study, we used extracellular electrophysiology and two-photon calcium imaging targeted toward two different layer 5 cell classes to characterize their tuning properties in V1, AL, and PM. We find that deep-layer neurons, similar to superficial layer neurons, are also specialized for different spatial and temporal frequencies, with the strongest differences between AL and V1, and AL and PM, but not V1 and PM. However, we note that the deep-layer neuron populations preferred a larger range of SFs and TFs compared to previous studies. We also find that extratelencephalically projecting layer 5 neurons are more direction selective than intratelencephalically projecting layer 5 neurons.

Indexed as

Visual CortexVisual PathwaysAnimalsCalciumMiceNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionCalciumelectrophysiologylayer 5micetwo-photon imagingvisual cortexvisual pathways

Identifiers

PMID36070574
PMCPMC9588602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.