Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36070518›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among hesitant adopters in the United States.

Rachel S Purvis, Ramey Moore, Don E Willis, Emily Hallgren, Pearl A McElfish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring COVID-19 Vaccine Decision Making: Insights from 'One-Shot Wonders' and 'Booster Enthusiasts'.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel S PurvisCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Ramey MooreCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Don E WillisCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Emily HallgrenCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Pearl A McElfishCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4033-6241

Funding

Evaluation of the cognitive function and socioeconomic, biomedical, and genetic risk factors of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) in older Marshallese residents of Northwest ArkansasR01MD013852 · NIMHD · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI MCELFISH, PEARL · 2019 to 2023
$7.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake is crucial to managing the endemic. In this qualitative study, we examine factors influencing the decision-making process of COVID-19 hesitant adopters - those who reported some level of hesitancy and are vaccinated. Using interviews with 49 participants, we documented multiple factors influencing the decision-making process to get the COVID-19 vaccine among a racially and ethnically diverse sample of hesitant adopters in the US. Participants described influences related to sociocultural context and personal and group influences, which affected their decision to get the COVID-19 vaccine despite being hesitant. We find politics, culture, healthcare professionals, employment, vaccine attitudes and beliefs, social networks, and the media influence the decision to get vaccinated. Our findings provide nuanced and in-depth information in their own words. This study expands on prior literature on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, especially among hesitant adopters. These findings can inform future interventions and research targeting vaccine-hesitant populations to increase vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansPoliticsQualitative ResearchUnited StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinedecision-makinghesitant adoptersvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36070518
PMCPMC9746519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.