ReviewAdvances in wound care2023
Individualized Risk Prediction for Improved Chronic Wound Management.
Review in Advances in wound care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Malignancy Recorded Among Secondary Diagnoses and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Hospitalized with Chronic Ulcers: A Nationwide Romanian Patient-Level Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for infection in chronic nonhealing wounds: a two-center retrospective study with external validation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Exploring New Horizons in Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Analysis.Recent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2026Review
- [Managing refractory wounds in the elderly with the concept of chronic critical illness].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Article
- Progress in the application of artificial intelligence in skin wound assessment and prediction of healing time.American journal of translational research · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.