ReviewScience advances2022
Abortion after
Review in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Weight and Procedural Abortion Complications: A Systematic Review.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Pooled it
- Patient-Reported Experiences of Abortion Travel.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Feminist Identity and Online Activism in Four Countries From 2019 to 2023.Social science computer review · 2025Article
- Blood Borders: State laws, vaccine misinformation, and the threat to the United States blood supply.Transfusion · 2025Article
- Efficacy of medication abortion with concurrent initiation of progestin contraceptives: A retrospective cohort study.Contraception · 2024Article
- Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2024Article
- Organizing Primary Care Clinicians to Expand Reproductive Health Access: A Qualitative Program Evaluation.Family medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Geography and Rurality on Preconception Health Status in the United States.Preventing chronic disease · 2023Article
- Abortion Restrictions Threaten All Reproductive Health Care Clinicians.American journal of public health · 2023Article
- Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- U.S. college students' perspectives on contraception and abortion post-Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Review
- The Impact of theKansas journal of medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court's
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.