Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36070123›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2022

Effectiveness of entecavir vs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for functional cure of chronic hepatitis B in an international cohort.

Yao-Chun Hsu, Dae Won Jun, Cheng-Yuan Peng, Ming-Lun Yeh, Huy Trinh, Grace Lai-Hung Wong, Sung Eun Kim, Chien-Hung Chen, Hyunwoo Oh, Chia-Hsin Lin and 36 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CD4Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

46 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Yao-Chun HsuCenter for Liver Diseases and School of Medicine, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Dae Won JunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Cheng-Yuan PengCenter for Digestive Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ming-Lun YehHepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Huy TrinhSan Jose Gastroenterology, San Jose, CA, USA.
Grace Lai-Hung WongDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sung Eun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea.
Chien-Hung ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hyunwoo OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chia-Hsin LinCenter for Digestive Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Lindsey TrinhSan Jose Gastroenterology, San Jose, CA, USA.
Vincent Wai-Sun WongDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Eilleen YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang Bong AhnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Daniel HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yong Kyun ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae Yoon JeongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, South Korea.
Soung Won JeongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyoung Su KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Qing XieDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Infection Disease, The Third Hospital of Kumming City, Kumming, China.
Mar Riveiro-BarcielaLiver Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Valle d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pei-Chien TsaiHepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Elena Vargas AccarinoLiver Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Valle d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hidenori ToyodaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
Masaru EnomotoDepartment of Hepatology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Carmen PredaInstitutul Clinic Fundeni-Gastroenterologie si Hepatologie, Bucharest, Romania.
Sebastián MarcianoHepatology and Department of Research, Hospital Italiano De Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Joseph HoangDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Chung-Feng HuangHepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ritsuzo KozukaDepartment of Hepatology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi YasudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
Doina IstratescuInstitutul Clinic Fundeni-Gastroenterologie si Hepatologie, Bucharest, Romania.
Dong-Hyun LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Good Gang-An Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Jia-Ying SuInstitute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yen-Tsung HuangInstitute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jee Fu HuangHepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chia-Yen DaiHepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wan-Long ChuangHepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Man-Fung YuenDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Adrian GadanoHepatology and Department of Research, Hospital Italiano De Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ramsey CheungDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Seng Gee LimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Maria ButiLiver Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Valle d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ming-Lung YuHepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Mindie H NguyenDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA. mindiehn@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-4989
Kaohsiung Medical University · TWUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESChina Medical University · TWChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHanyang University Seoul Hospital · KRHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARInstitute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica · TWInstitutul Clinic Fundeni · RONational University of Singapore · SGOgaki Municipal Hospital · JPOsaka City University · JPStanford Medicine · USChang Gung University · TWEulji University · KRFu Jen Catholic University · TWHallym University · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHanyang University Guri Hospital · KRInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBoth entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are first-line therapies for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but their comparative effectiveness with regards to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance remains unclear.

methodsThis international multicenter cohort study enrolled 7697 treatment-naïve CHB patients (median age 50 years; male 66.75%) initiated on either ETV (n = 5430) or TDF (n = 2267) without baseline malignancy or immunosuppression from 23 centers across 10 countries or regions. Patients were observed for HBsAg seroclearance until death, loss to follow-up, or treatment discontinuation or switching. The incidences of HBsAg seroclearance were adjusted for competing mortality and compared between ETV and TDF cohorts with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and also by multivariable regression analysis.

resultsThe study population was followed up for a median duration of 56.1 months with 36,929 11 person-years of observation. HBsAg seroclearance occurred in 70 ETV-treated and 21 TDF-treated patients, yielding 8-year cumulative incidence of 1.69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-2.17) for ETV and 1.34% (95% CI 0.85-2.10%), for TDF (p = 0.58). In the IPTW analysis with the two study cohorts more balanced in background covariates, the age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of TDF versus ETV for HBsAg seroclearance was 0.91 (95% CI 0.50-1.64; p = 0.75). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the two medications in the multivariable competing risk regression model (adjusted sub-distributional HR 0.92 for TDF vs. ETV; 95% CI 0.56-1.53; p = 0.76).

conclusionsETV and TDF did not differ significantly in the incidence of HBsAg seroclearance, which rarely occurred with either regimen.

Indexed as

Hepatitis B, ChronicAntiviral AgentsCohort StudiesGuanineHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B virusHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTenofovirTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsentecavirGuanineHepatitis B Surface AntigensTenofovirComparative effectivenessEntecavirFunctional cureHepatitis B virusTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID36070123
OpenAlexW4294921615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.