Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36070116›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Readmission After Colorectal Surgery.

Kevin A Chen, Chinmaya U Joisa, Karyn B Stitzenberg, Jonathan Stem, Jose G Guillem, Shawn M Gomez, Muneera R Kapadia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Data leakage of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program present at time of surgery variables.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin A ChenDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 100 Manning Drive, Burnett Womack Building, Suite 4038, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Chinmaya U JoisaJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina, 10202C Mary Ellen Jones Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Karyn B StitzenbergDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 100 Manning Drive, Burnett Womack Building, Suite 4038, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Jonathan StemDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 100 Manning Drive, Burnett Womack Building, Suite 4038, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Jose G GuillemDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 100 Manning Drive, Burnett Womack Building, Suite 4038, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Shawn M GomezJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina, 10202C Mary Ellen Jones Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Muneera R KapadiaDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, 100 Manning Drive, Burnett Womack Building, Suite 4038, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. muneera_kapadia@med.unc.edu.

Funding

UNC Integrated Translational Oncology Program (UNC-iTOP)T32CA244125 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM, Jen Jen Yeh · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA244125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReadmission after colorectal surgery is common and often implies complications for patients and costs for hospitals. Previous works have created predictive models using logistic regression for this outcome but have shown limited accuracy. Machine learning has shown promise in improving predictions by identifying non-linear patterns in data. We sought to create a more accurate predictive model for readmission after colorectal surgery using machine learning.

methodsPatients who underwent colorectal surgery were identified in the National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database including years 2012-2019 and split into training, validation, and test sets. The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days of surgery. Three types of machine learning models were created, including random forest (RF), gradient boosting (XGB), and neural network (NN). A logistic regression (LR) model was also created for comparison. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

resultsThe dataset included 213,827 patients after application of exclusion criteria. A total of 23,083 (10.8%) of patients experienced readmission. NN obtained an AUROC of 0.751 (95% CI 0.743-0.759), compared with 0.684 (95% CI 0.676-0.693) for LR. RF and XGB performed similarly with AUROCs of 0.749 (95% CI 0.741-0.757) and 0.745 (95% CI 0.737-0.753) respectively. Ileus, index admission length of stay, organ-space surgical site infection present at time of surgery, and ostomy placement were identified as the most contributory variables.

conclusionsMachine learning approaches outperformed traditional statistical methods in the prediction of readmission after colorectal surgery. After external validation, this improved prediction model could be used to target interventions to reduce readmission rate.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryPatient ReadmissionHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningROC CurveArtificial intelligenceColorectalMachine learningReadmission

Identifiers

PMID36070116
PMCPMC10081888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.