Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069998›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2023

[Emergency department visits by nursing home residents: analysis of routine data from an urban hospital].

Falk Hoffmann, Kirsten Habbinga

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Core curriculum of intensive care and emergency medicine in internal medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Falk HoffmannDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstr. 140, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland. falk.hoffmann@uni-oldenburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0182-5373
Kirsten HabbingaPius-Hospital, Medizinischer Campus der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of emergency department (ED) visits in Germany continues to increase, especially by older people and persons receiving care.

objectivesWe aimed to characterize ED visits by nursing home residents (NHR) in Germany. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed routine data of a hospital without trauma surgery (Pius-Hospital Oldenburg). All ED visits by NHR in the period 06/2014-05/2017 were selected from the hospital information system.

resultsOf 47,270 ED visits, 1676 (3.6%) were NHR (mean age: 78.8 years; 62.9% women; 40.3% were referred). Of them, 20.1% were on weekends and 80.6% occurred between 8 am-8 pm. A total of 84.2% visits led to hospitalization; the length of stay was 1 day for 21.1% and 2-3 days for another 14.6%. With longer length of stay, the proportion of admissions by referring physicians increased. Of those admitted, 10.3% died during hospitalization (28.2% on the day of admission; 47.9% within the first 3 days). People who died were older, their visits were more frequently on weekends, and they were less often referred.

conclusionOur study reveals problems in several areas. Improved interprofessional cooperation with general practitioners and strengthened palliative structures should be implemented in nursing homes. Furthermore, there is a need for establishing processes in EDs to realize continued outpatient care for these patients.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentEnd of lifeHospital useResidential facilitiesTriage

Identifiers

PMID36069998
PMCPMC10564807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.