ArticleJournal of fish biology2022
Chronic experimental hyperoxia elevates aerobic scope: a valid method to test for physiological oxygen limitations in fish.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxygen uptake of rainbow trout during acute warming: effects of oxygen supersaturation and aerobic exercise.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- The impact of isosmotic conditions on the metabolism and hypoxia tolerance of a reportedly oxyconforming teleost.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Oxygen supersaturation has negligible effects on warming tolerance across diverse aquatic ectotherms.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Hyperoxia does not improve the acute upper thermal tolerance of a tropical marine fish (Lutjanus apodus).The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of enhanced cardiorespiratory performance under hyperoxia differ with exposure duration in yellowtail kingfish.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Respiratory acidosis and OConservation physiology · 2024Article
- Supplemental oxygen does not improve growth but can enhance reproductive capacity of fish.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Chronic experimental hyperoxia elevates aerobic scope: a valid method to test for physiological oxygen limitations in fish.Journal of fish biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental hyperoxia has been shown to enhance the maximum oxygen uptake capacity of fishes under acute conditions, potentially offering an avenue to test prominent physiological hypotheses attempting to explain impacts of climate warming on fish populations (e.g., gill-oxygen limitation driving declines in fish size). Such benefits of experimental hyperoxia must persist under chronic conditions if it is to provide a valid manipulation to test the relevant hypotheses, yet the long-term benefits of experimental hyperoxia to oxygen uptake capacity have not been examined. Here, the authors measured aerobic metabolic performance of Galaxias maculatus upon acute exposure to hyperoxia (150% air saturation) and after 5 months of acclimation, at both 15°C and 20°C. Acute hyperoxia elevated aerobic scope by 74%-94% relative to normoxic controls, and an elevation of 58%-73% persisted after 5 months of hyperoxia acclimation. When hyperoxia-acclimated fish were acutely transitioned back to normoxia, they maintained superior aerobic performance compared with normoxic controls, suggesting an acclimation of the underlying metabolic structures/processes. In demonstrating the long-term benefits of experimental hyperoxia on the aerobic performance of a fish, the authors encourage the use of such approaches to disentangle the role of oxygen in driving the responses of fish populations to climate warming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.