Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069963›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2023

Analysis of clinical predictors of kidney diseases in type 2 diabetes patients based on machine learning.

Dongna Hui, Yiyang Sun, Shixin Xu, Junjie Liu, Ping He, Yuhui Deng, Huaxiong Huang, Xiaoshuang Zhou, Rongshan Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dongna Hui *Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, No. 92 Wucheng Road, Xiaodian District, Taiyuan, 030006, Shanxi, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4331-7027
Yiyang Sun *Zu Chongzhi Center for Mathematics and Computational Sciences (CMCS), Data Science Research Center (DSRC), Duke Kunshan University, 8 Duke Ave, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Shixin XuZu Chongzhi Center for Mathematics and Computational Sciences (CMCS), Data Science Research Center (DSRC), Duke Kunshan University, 8 Duke Ave, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
Junjie LiuBNU-HKBU United International College, 2000 Jintong Road, Tangjiawan, Zhuhai, 519087, Guangdong, China.
Ping HeBNU-HKBU United International College, 2000 Jintong Road, Tangjiawan, Zhuhai, 519087, Guangdong, China.
Yuhui DengBNU-HKBU United International College, 2000 Jintong Road, Tangjiawan, Zhuhai, 519087, Guangdong, China.
Huaxiong HuangResearch Center for Mathematics, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China. hhuang@uic.edu.cn.
Xiaoshuang ZhouDepartment of Nephrology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, No. 29 Shuangta Street, Yingze District, Taiyuan, 030012, Shanxi, China. zhouxiaoshuang@sxmu.edu.cn.
Rongshan LiInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Shanxi University, No. 92 Wucheng Road, Xiaodian District, Taiyuan, 030006, Shanxi, China. rongshanli@126.com.
Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University · CNShanxi Medical University · CNDuke Kunshan University · CN

Funding

Kunshan Government Research R97030020S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe heterogeneity of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) complicated with renal diseases has not been fully understood in clinical practice. The purpose of the study was to propose potential predictive factors to identify diabetic kidney disease (DKD), nondiabetic kidney disease (NDKD), and DKD superimposed on NDKD (DKD + NDKD) in T2DM patients noninvasively and accurately.

methodsTwo hundred forty-one eligible patients confirmed by renal biopsy were enrolled in this retrospective, analytical study. The features composed of clinical and biochemical data prior to renal biopsy were extracted from patients' electronic medical records. Machine learning algorithms were used to distinguish among different kidney diseases pairwise. Feature variables selected in the developed model were evaluated.

resultsLogistic regression model achieved an accuracy of 0.8306 ± 0.0057 for DKD and NDKD classification. Hematocrit, diabetic retinopathy (DR), hematuria, platelet distribution width and history of hypertension were identified as important risk factors. Then SVM model allowed us to differentiate NDKD from DKD + NDKD with accuracy 0.8686 ± 0.052 where hematuria, diabetes duration, international normalized ratio (INR), D-Dimer, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were the top risk factors. Finally, the logistic regression model indicated that DD-dimer, hematuria, INR, systolic pressure, DR were likely to be predictive factors to identify DKD with DKD + NDKD.

conclusionPredictive factors were successfully identified among different renal diseases in type 2 diabetes patients via machine learning methods. More attention should be paid on the coagulation factors in the DKD + NDKD patients, which might indicate a hypercoagulable state and an increased risk of thrombosis.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesHematuriaHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesKidney diseases diagnosisMachine learningNoninvasiveType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID36069963
OpenAlexW4294919648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.