ArticleJournal of animal science2023
Extension of the reduced animal model to single-step methods.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short Communication: Reduced GBLUP equations to core animals in the algorithm for proven and young (APY).Veterinary and animal science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For a few decades, animal models (AMs) in the form of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) have been used for the genetic evaluation of animals. An equation system is set in the order of all the effects in the model, including all the animals in the pedigree. Solving these large equation systems has been a challenge. Reduced AM (RAM) was introduced in 1980, which allowed setting up equations for parents instead of all animals. That greatly reduced the number of equations to be solved. The RAM is followed by a back-solving step, in which progenies' breeding values are obtained conditional on parental breeding values. Initially, pedigree information was utilized to model genetic relationships between animals. With the availability of genomic information, genomic BLUP (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), and single-step marker models were developed. Single-step methods utilize pedigree and genomic information for simultaneous genetic evaluation of genotyped and nongenotyped animals. There has been a shortage of studies on RAM development for genetic evaluation models utilizing genomic information. This study extended the concept of RAM from BLUP to the single-step methods. Using example data, three RAMs were described for ssGBLUP. The order of animal equations was reduced from the total number of animals to (1) genotyped animals and nongenotyped parents, (2) genotyped animals and nongenotyped phenotyped animals, and (3) genotyped animals and nongenotyped parents of phenotyped nongenotyped nonparents. Solutions for the remaining animals are obtained following a back-solving step. All the RAMs produced identical results to the full ssGBLUP. Advances in computational hardware have alleviated many computational limitations, but, on the other hand, the size of data is growing rapidly by the number of animals, traits, phenotypes, genotypes, and genotype density. There is an opportunity for a RAM comeback for the single-step methods to reduce the computational demands by reducing the number of equations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.