ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022
Predicting success of intrauterine insemination using a clinically based scoring system.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smartphone-Assisted CSCTAS-Derived Sperm Kinematics and Clinical Pregnancy after Intrauterine Insemination in a Turkish Cohort of Couples with Unexplained Infertility.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Epigenetic sperm quality testing for predicting fertility treatment success: a real-world and multi-site analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Community awareness of assisted reproductive technologies in Jordan: educational gaps and knowledge levels.BMC public health · 2026Article
- An Artificial Intelligence-Based Model to Predict Pregnancy After Intrauterine Insemination: A Retrospective Analysis of 9501 Cycles.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of adenomyosis on intrauterine insemination success in unexplained infertile women: a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- A Clinical Assessment of the Outcomes of Intrauterine Insemination Based on Mid-cycle Luteinizing Hormone Levels.Cureus · 2025Article
- Intra-individual changes in sperm parameters and total motile count with time among infertile men.Andrology · 2025Article
- Seminal plasma metabolomics and sperm lipidomics profiles of bull semen with different total progressive motile sperm count.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Scoring prognostic factors for pregnancy post-intrauterine insemination in couples with infertility.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Observational
- Rescue intrauterine insemination in women failing to retrieve oocytes at ovum pick-up: report of a case series.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Is There Any Effect of Change in Pre-Wash and Post-Wash Semen Parameters on the Success of Intrauterine Insemination?Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a predictive score for the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) based on clinical parameters.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the homologous IUI cycles performed at a single university-based reproductive medical center between 2009 and 2017. The primary outcome measure was pregnancy, defined as positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 12-14 days after IUI. Predictive factors for pregnancy after IUI were identified, and a predictive score was developed using a multivariable continuation ratio model.
resultsOverall, 1437 IUI cycles in 758 couples were evaluated. We found a per cycle pregnancy rate of 10.9% and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 19.4%. In a multivariable analysis, the probability of pregnancy was negatively associated with female age ≥ 35 years (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p = 0.034), endometriosis, unilateral tubal factor, or anatomical alteration (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89, p = 0.016), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) < 1 ng/ml (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87, p = 0.014), and total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC) < 5 mil (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.19-0.72, p = 0.004). We developed a predictive clinical score ranging from 0 to 5. Following 3 cycles, couples in our cohort with a score of 5 had a cumulative probability of achieving pregnancy of nearly 45%. In contrast, couples with a score of 0 had a cumulative probability of only 5%.
conclusionIUI success rates vary widely depending on couples' characteristics. A simple to use score could be used to estimate a couple's chance of achieving pregnancy via IUI, facilitating individualized counseling and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.