Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069921›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Predicting success of intrauterine insemination using a clinically based scoring system.

Anna Lena Zippl, Alfons Wachter, Patrick Rockenschaub, Bettina Toth, Beata Seeber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Lena Zippl *Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alfons Wachter *Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Patrick RockenschaubInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK.
Bettina TothDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Beata SeeberDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. beata.seeber@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-8224-4126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a predictive score for the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) based on clinical parameters.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the homologous IUI cycles performed at a single university-based reproductive medical center between 2009 and 2017. The primary outcome measure was pregnancy, defined as positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 12-14 days after IUI. Predictive factors for pregnancy after IUI were identified, and a predictive score was developed using a multivariable continuation ratio model.

resultsOverall, 1437 IUI cycles in 758 couples were evaluated. We found a per cycle pregnancy rate of 10.9% and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 19.4%. In a multivariable analysis, the probability of pregnancy was negatively associated with female age ≥ 35 years (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p = 0.034), endometriosis, unilateral tubal factor, or anatomical alteration (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89, p = 0.016), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) < 1 ng/ml (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87, p = 0.014), and total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC) < 5 mil (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.19-0.72, p = 0.004). We developed a predictive clinical score ranging from 0 to 5. Following 3 cycles, couples in our cohort with a score of 5 had a cumulative probability of achieving pregnancy of nearly 45%. In contrast, couples with a score of 0 had a cumulative probability of only 5%.

conclusionIUI success rates vary widely depending on couples' characteristics. A simple to use score could be used to estimate a couple's chance of achieving pregnancy via IUI, facilitating individualized counseling and decision-making.

Indexed as

Anti-Mullerian HormoneSemenAdultChorionic GonadotropinFemaleHumansInseminationInsemination, ArtificialMalePregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesAnti-Mullerian HormoneChorionic GonadotropinClinical scoreInfertilityIUIPrediction modelPregnancy rate

Identifiers

PMID36069921
PMCPMC9519724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.