Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069785›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2022

Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Postsecondary Students: Randomized Factorial Trial for Examining Motivational Interviewing and Booster Lessons.

Vanessa Peynenburg, Heather Hadjistavropoulos, David Thiessen, Nickolai Titov, Blake Dear

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04264585 (Examining Motivational Interviewing and Booster Sessions in Internet-delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Post-secondary Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04264585 nacompletednot on this map

Examining Motivational Interviewing and Booster Sessions in Internet-delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Post-secondary Students: An Implementation Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ReginaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled308ConditionsAnxiety, DepressionArmsInternet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy, Motivational Interviewing, Booster Session
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vanessa PeynenburgDepartment of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8686-2717
Heather HadjistavropoulosDepartment of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7092-9056
David ThiessenDepartment of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1167-1585
Nickolai TitoveCentre Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7268-729X
Blake DeareCentre Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9324-3092
University of Regina · CAMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) can improve access to mental health care for students, although high attrition rates are concerning and little is known about long-term outcomes. Motivational interviewing (MI) exercises and booster lessons can improve engagement and outcomes in face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the use of pretreatment MI exercises and booster lessons in ICBT for postsecondary students.

methodsIn this factorial trial (factor 1: web-based MI before treatment; factor 2: self-guided booster lesson 1 month after treatment), 308 clients were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment conditions, with 277 (89.9%) clients starting treatment. All clients received a 5-week transdiagnostic ICBT course (the UniWellbeing course). Primary outcomes included changes in depression, anxiety, and perceived academic functioning from before treatment to after treatment and at the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups.

resultsOverall, 54% (150/277) of students completed treatment and reported large improvements in symptoms of depression and anxiety and small improvements in academic functioning after treatment, which were maintained at the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups. Pretreatment MI did not contribute to better treatment completion or engagement, although small between-group effects favored MI for reductions in depression (Cohen d=0.23) and anxiety (Cohen d=0.25) after treatment. Only 30.9% (43/139) of students randomized to one of the booster conditions accessed the booster. Overall, no main effects were found for the booster. Subanalyses revealed that clients who accessed the booster had larger decreases in depressive symptoms (Cohen d=0.31) at the 3-month follow-up. No interactions were found between MI and the booster.

conclusionsRather than offering MI before treatment, clients may experience more benefits from MI exercises later in ICBT when motivation wanes. The low uptake of the self-guided booster limited our conclusions regarding its effectiveness. Future research should examine offering a booster for a longer duration after treatment, with therapist support and a longer follow-up period.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04264585; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04264585.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMotivational InterviewingHumansInternetStudentsTreatment Outcomeboostersinternet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapymotivational interviewingpostsecondary studentstransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID36069785
PMCPMC9494224
OpenAlexW4294917543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.