Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069762›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Determinants of Physical Activity in the Cardiac Population: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Johanna Gutenberg, Stefan Tino Kulnik, Josef Niebauer, Rik Crutzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna GutenbergLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6130-701X
Stefan Tino KulnikLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5419-6713
Josef NiebauerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-9041
Rik CrutzenDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-6610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLack of physical activity is a critical contributing risk factor to cardiovascular disease. Hence, regular physical activity is a mainstay in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Despite the extensive promotion of physical activity in both primary and secondary prevention programs, including cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity levels in the cardiac population remain low. Therefore, it is crucial to understand critical determinants that influence physical activity behavior.

objectiveThis study aims to deliver a systematic review of studies with collated observational data exploring the association between determinants and physical activity behavior in the target population. These new insights inform the design of future interventions targeted at lasting heart-healthy physical activity behavior in the cardiac population.

methodsPrimary studies with observational quantitative data on determinants and their association with physical activity behavior in the cardiac population will be included. Information on relevant primary studies will be retrieved from various databases, including Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Web of Science Core Collection. Six reviewers will independently double-screen articles. Studies will be selected according to the prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data will be extracted and entered into suitable worksheets. The US-based National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Study Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Studies will be used to assess the quality of all eligible primary studies. The results will be presented in a descriptive and narrative synthesis. If the type and quality of data are suitable, meta-analyses will be conducted. Study reporting will follow the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement.

resultsData collection started in September 2020, and the literature search was updated in July 2021. Data synthesis is ongoing, and the literature search will be updated in October 2022.

conclusionsThis review will be valuable to relevant stakeholders, including clinicians and health care professionals, intervention developers, and decision makers in health care. It lays a comprehensive foundation for understanding the determinants of physical activity to inform the design of secondary prevention interventions relevant to the cardiac population.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42020206637; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=206637. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/39188.

Indexed as

behavior changecardiac diseasecardiac rehabilitationcardiovascular diseasecliniciandecision-makingdeterminantshealth care workerhealth interventionhealth promotionheart diseaseheart healthyphysical activityprotocolsecondary preventionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36069762
PMCPMC9494216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.