Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069758›Full record

SynthesisClinical microbiology reviews2022

Reassessment of Historical Clinical Trials Supports the Effectiveness of Phage Therapy.

Luigi Marongiu, Markus Burkard, Ulrich M Lauer, Ludwig E Hoelzle, Sascha Venturelli

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Giving Antibiotics a Second Chance: Evolutionary Trade-Offs and Phage-Driven Restoration of Antibiotic Susceptibility.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Isolation and Genomic Characterization of LyticLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luigi MarongiuDepartment of Biochemistry of Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4720-7087
Markus BurkardDepartment of Biochemistry of Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ulrich M LauerDepartment of Internal Medicine VIII, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ludwig E HoelzleInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Sascha VenturelliDepartment of Biochemistry of Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage therapy has become a hot topic in medical research due to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains. In the treatment of bacterial infections, bacteriophages have several advantages over antibiotics, including strain specificity, lack of serious side effects, and low development costs. However, scientists dismissed the clinical success of early clinical trials in the 1940s, slowing the adoption of this promising antibacterial application in Western countries. The current study used statistical methods commonly used in modern meta-analysis to reevaluate early 20th-century studies and compare them with clinical trials conducted in the last 20 years. Using a random effect model, the development of disease after treatment with or without phages was measured in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Based on the findings of 17 clinical trials conducted between 1921 and 1940, phage therapy was effective (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.44,

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBacteriophagesPhage TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsbacteriophage therapyclinical trialseffectivenessFelix d’Hérellehistorical evaluationhistory of sciencemeta-analysisphage therapysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36069758
PMCPMC9769689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.