Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069479›Full record

Trial reportActa orthopaedica2022

Denosumab prevents acetabular bone loss around an uncemented cup: analysis of secondary outcomes in a randomized controlled trial.

Demostenis Kiritopoulos, Andreas Nyström, Gösta Ullmark, Jens Sörensen, Marianne Petrén-Mallmin, Jan Milbrink, Nils P Hailer, Hans Mallmin

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Perioperative denosumab exposure and risk of revision after total hip and knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a registry-based data linkage study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Continuous periprosthetic bone loss around the TOPBMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Demostenis KiritopoulosDepartment of Surgical Sciences/Section of Orthopedics, Uppsala University. demostenis.kiritopoulos@surgsci.uu.se.
Andreas NyströmDepartment of Surgical Sciences/Section of Orthopedics, Uppsala University.
Gösta UllmarkDepartment of Orthopedics, Gävle Hospital.
Jens SörensenDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Section of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Uppsala University.
Marianne Petrén-MallminDepartment of Surgical Sciences/ Section of Radiology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Jan MilbrinkDepartment of Surgical Sciences/Section of Orthopedics, Uppsala University.
Nils P HailerDepartment of Surgical Sciences/Section of Orthopedics, Uppsala University.
Hans MallminDepartment of Surgical Sciences/Section of Orthopedics, Uppsala University.
Uppsala University · SEGävle Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeUncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with periprosthetic bone loss. In a secondary outcome analysis from a randomized controlled trial, we studied whether denosumab can prevent loss of acetabular periprosthetic bone mineral density (pBMD) in patients who received a trabecular metal cup during uncemented THA. PATIENTS AND

methods64 patients (aged 35-65 years) with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip were randomized to 2 subcutaneous injections with denosumab or placebo, given 1-3 days post-surgery and 6 months post-surgery. Acetabular pBMD was measured in 5 regions of interest (ROIs) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Serum markers for bone metabolism were analyzed. Periprosthetic osteoblastic activity, measured as standardized uptake values (SUVs) by [18F] positron emission tomography/computed tomography, was evaluated in 32 of the 64 study patients.

resultsAfter 12 months, patients treated with denosumab had higher pBMD compared with the placebo-treated patients in 4 of 5 ROIs and in sum of ROIs 1-5. After 24 months, the effect on pBMD for patients treated with denosumab declined. Serum markers declined pronouncedly up to 12 months in patients treated with denosumab, but rebounded above baseline levels after 24 months. Patients treated with denosumab had statistically significantly lower SUVs in all ROIs, except ROI 5, after 6 months.

interpretationBased on this exploratory analysis of secondary endpoints the application of denosumab seems associated with preserved acetabular pBMD, reduced bone metabolism and attenuated periprosthetic osteoblastic activity. However, given the known rebound affects after discontinuation of denosumab treatment, these effects cannot be expected to persist. If prolonged treatment or shift to other regimes would be beneficial to reduce the risk of cup loosening is yet to be investigated.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone Diseases, MetabolicHip ProsthesisAbsorptiometry, PhotonAcetabulumBone DensityDenosumabFollow-Up StudiesHumansDenosumab

Identifiers

PMID36069479
PMCPMC9450252
OpenAlexW4294877674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.