Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069478›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2023

Allied health in residential aged care: Using routinely collected data to improve funding opportunities.

Isabelle Meulenbroeks, Karla Seaman, Magdalena Z Raban, Johanna Westbrook

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Communication partner training for aged-care workers: A scoping review.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabelle MeulenbroeksAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-7845
Karla SeamanAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-9616
Magdalena Z RabanAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-2849
Johanna WestbrookAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-8192

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1143941National Health and Medical Research Council APP1170898National Health and Medical Research Council APP2013953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumers and providers have long been advocating for increased access to and delivery of allied health services in Australian residential aged care (RAC). There is significant evidence that allied health interventions are effective; however, there is limited evidence on the benefit of routine day-to-day allied health service delivery in RAC. This information is critical to effectively inform funders and policy advisors of the necessity of allied health in RAC. To improve arguments for future funding opportunities, providers, facilities and consumers need to partner together to use routinely collected, yet disparate, data, in electronic health and billing records, to improve data collection practices and evidence generation on allied health in aged care.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelRoutinely Collected Health DataAgedAustraliaDissent and DisputesHumansAllied health occupationsElectronic health recordsHomes for the aged

Identifiers

PMID36069478
PMCPMC10946826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.