Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069388›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2023

Prophylactic mastectomy and occult malignancy: Surgical and imaging considerations.

Jessica L Thompson, Brandy R Sinco, Rachel L McCaffrey, Alfred E Chang, Michael S Sabel, Lesly A Dossett, Tasha M Hughes, Jacqueline S Jeruss

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L ThompsonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8025-9220
Brandy R SincoCenter for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Rachel L McCaffreyDepartment of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1251-479X
Alfred E ChangDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Michael S SabelDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-2914
Lesly A DossettDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-1073
Tasha M HughesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-1143
Jacqueline S JerussDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel node biopsy (SLNB) is not routinely recommended for patients undergoing prophylactic mastectomy (PM), yet omission remains a subject of debate among surgeons. A modern patient cohort was examined to determine occult malignancy (OM) incidence within PM specimens to reinforce current recommendations.

methodsAll PM performed over a 5-year period were retrospectively identified, including women with unilateral breast cancer who underwent synchronous or delayed contralateral PM or women with elevated cancer risk who underwent bilateral PM.

resultsThe study population included 772 patients (598 CPM, 174 BPM) with a total of 39 OM identified: 17 invasive cancers (14 CPM, 3 BPM) and 22 DCIS (19 CPM, 3 BPM). Of the 86 patients for whom SLNB was selectively performed, 1 micrometastasis was identified. In the CPM cohort, risk of OM increased with age, presence of LCIS of either breast, or presence of a non-BRCA high-penetrance gene mutation, while preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was associated with lower likelihood of OM.

conclusionsGiven the low incidence of invasive OM in this updated series, routine SLNB is of low value for patients undergoing PM. For patients with indeterminate radiographic findings, discordant preoperative biopsies, LCIS, or non-BRCA high-penetrance gene mutations, selective SLNB implementation could be considered.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryProphylactic MastectomyFemaleHumansMastectomyRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsybreast canceroccult malignancypreoperative breast imagingprophylactic mastectomysentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36069388
PMCPMC10087968
OpenAlexW4294873823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.