ArticleXenotransplantation2022
The attitudes of religious group leaders towards xenotransplantation: A focus group study.
Article in Xenotransplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Xenotransplantation: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- The importance of public engagement in clinical xenotransplantation.Health care science · 2024Review
- Xenotransplantation: A historical-ethical account of viewpoints.Xenotransplantation · 2023Review
- Clinical Translation of Bio-Artificial Pancreas Therapies: Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Interdisciplinary Considerations and Key Recommendations.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Review
- The potential of genetically engineered pig heart transplantation in infants with complex congenital heart disease.Pediatric transplantation · 2022Review
- The 2021 IXA Keith Reemtsma Lecture: Moving xenotransplantation to the clinic.Xenotransplantation · 2022Review
- Genetically engineered pig kidney transplantation in a brain-dead human subject.Xenotransplantation · 2021Article
- "You cannot stay in the laboratory forever"*: Taking pig kidney xenotransplantation from the laboratory to the clinic.EBioMedicine · 2021Review
- Religious Perspectives Regarding the Ethical Issues Associated With Clinical Xenotransplantation.XenotransplantationArticle
- Religion and Attitudes Toward Xenotransplantation: Results of a Nationwide Survey in the United States.XenotransplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical trials of xenotransplantation (XTx) may start in coming years. Religious views have been mentioned as possible barriers to XTx acceptance. While there have been reports on perspectives of theologians in regard to XTx, no report has studied the perspectives of community religious leaders. A focus group was conducted with a sample of members of the following faith groups: Islam, Catholicism, and Protestantism. Qualitative content analysis was performed to identify interpretive themes. Four themes emerged. Participants were receptive to the idea of XTx and expressed no religious barriers to accepting a pig xenograft as a lifesaving therapy but did express certain concerns. Religious leaders accept the idea of XTx and do not see it as contradictory to their beliefs. However, some concerns were raised. Future studies addressing these concerns and exploring the potential role of religious leaders in educating the community on XTx are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.