Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069202›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Sulopenem or Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.

Michael W Dunne, Steven I Aronin, Anita F Das, Karthik Akinapelli, Michael T Zelasky, Sailaja Puttagunta, Helen W Boucher

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03354598 (A Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Multi-center Double-blind Study of Efficacy Tolerability & Safety of Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03354598 phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Multi-center Double-blind Study of Efficacy Tolerability & Safety of Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections (uUTI) in Adult Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorIterum Therapeutics, International LimitedRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,671ConditionsUncomplicated Urinary Tract InfectionsArmsSulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid, Ciprofloxacin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sulopenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections: From an Invisible Impact to a Visible Change in Complex Care.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. What's Hot This Year in ID Clinical Science 2025.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  8. The oral penems and carbapenems.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. What's Hot This Year in Infectious Diseases Clinical Science.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael W DunneIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6186-5196
Steven I AroninIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.
Anita F DasDas Statistical Consulting, Guerneville, California, USA.
Karthik AkinapelliIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.
Michael T ZelaskyIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.
Sailaja PuttaguntaIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.
Helen W BoucherTufts Medicine and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Fulcrum Therapeutics (United States) · USTufts University · USWest County Health Centers · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are limited treatment options for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) caused by resistant pathogens. Sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid (sulopenem) is an oral thiopenem antibiotic active against multidrug-resistant pathogens that cause uUTIs.

methodsPatients with uUTI were randomized to 5 days of sulopenem or 3 days of ciprofloxacin. The primary endpoint was overall success, defined as both clinical and microbiologic response at day 12. In patients with ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible baseline pathogens, sulopenem was compared for superiority over ciprofloxacin; in patients with ciprofloxacin-susceptible pathogens, the agents were compared for noninferiority. Using prespecified hierarchical statistical testing, the primary endpoint was tested in the combined population if either superiority or noninferiority was declared in the nonsusceptible or susceptible population, respectively.

resultsIn the nonsusceptible population, sulopenem was superior to ciprofloxacin, 62.6% vs 36.0% (difference, 26.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1 to 7.4; P <.001). In the susceptible population, sulopenem was not noninferior to ciprofloxacin, 66.8% vs 78.6% (difference, -11.8%; 95% CI, -18.0 to 5.6). The difference was driven by a higher rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) post-treatment in patients on sulopenem. In the combined analysis, sulopenem was noninferior to ciprofloxacin, 65.6% vs 67.9% (difference, -2.3%; 95% CI, -7.9 to 3.3). Diarrhea occurred more frequently with sulopenem (12.4% vs 2.5%).

conclusionsSulopenem was noninferior to ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uUTIs. Sulopenem was superior to ciprofloxacin in patients with uUTIs due to ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible pathogens. Sulopenem was not noninferior in patients with ciprofloxacin-susceptible pathogens, driven largely by a lower rate of ASB in those who received ciprofloxacin. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03354598.

Indexed as

CiprofloxacinUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansLactamsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinLactamssulopenemsulopenemuncomplicated urinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID36069202
PMCPMC9825825
OpenAlexW4294868422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.