ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2022
Long-term improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars following a single treatment with acoustic subcision-A single center proof-of-concept study.
Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Needle-Free Jet Injection of Poly-(Lactic Acid) for Atrophic Acne Scars: Literature Review and Report of Clinical Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Unremitting pro-inflammatory T-cell phenotypes, and macrophage activity, following paediatric burn injury.Clinical & translational immunology · 2024Article
- Mmp2 Deficiency Leads to Defective Parturition and High Dystocia Rates in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Long-term improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars following a single treatment with acoustic subcision-A single center proof-of-concept study.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectivesFibrosis, including hypertrophic scar formation, is a pathological condition characterized by excessive production and accumulation of collagen, and loss of tissue architecture, in response to wound healing. Alterations in the extracellular matrix (ECM) biomechanical properties may be important in modulating myofibroblasts and fibrosis formation. The acoustic subcision device uses rapid acoustic pulse technology to noninvasively improve the appearance of hypertrophic scars through both microdisruption of scar tissue matrix and downregulation of fibrotic fibroblasts leading to scar remodeling. The objective of this single-site proof-of-concept IRB-approved human clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of acoustic subcision device for the improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars.
methodEleven hypertrophic scars in 10 participants were treated with a single 6-minute acoustic subcision application without anesthesia. Posttreatment adverse events (AEs) and tolerability were recorded. At 12 and 89 weeks posttreatment, scar heights and volumes were measured, and participant satisfaction questionnaires were completed. Finally, at the last visit the scar appearance was assessed by the Principal Investigator (PI) using the Mecott Modified Scar Scale (MMSS).
resultsImmediately following the acoustic subcision treatment, only mild, moderate erythema or pinpoint bleeding were noted. The treatment sessions were considered tolerable by all participants with an average pain score of 2.2 (on a 0-10 pain score with 10 being the worse possible pain). The 12- and 89-week assessments demonstrated mean height reductions of 46.3% and 56.8%, respectively from baseline. The differences in scar height were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The 12- and 89-week assessments demonstrated a mean volume reduction of 63.2% and 58.1% respectively from baseline. The differences in the scar volume were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The PI graded an average improvement of 33.7% in scar appearance using the MMSS, a statistically significant change (p < 0.001). Finally, >90% of participants reported satisfaction with the improvement in their scar.
conclusionThis proof-of-concept study showed that a single noninvasive acoustic subcision treatment session can safely provide statistically significant improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars with minimal treatment pain and meaningful participant satisfaction. More work is needed on a larger number of scars to verify this finding. Further improvement in appearance is expected with multiple acoustic subcision treatments and/or treatments in combination with currently available options. Additional trials to verify this are planned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.