Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069159›Full record

ArticleMicroscopy research and technique2023

Acquisition and evaluation procedure to improve the accuracy of SAED.

Zsolt Czigány, Viktória Kovács Kis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microscopy research and technique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zsolt CzigányInstitute of Technical Physics and Materials Science, Centre for Energy Research, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-8801
Viktória Kovács KisInstitute of Technical Physics and Materials Science, Centre for Energy Research, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6412-2320
HUN-REN Centre for Energy Research · HU

Funding

European Structural and Investment Funds VEKOP-2.3.2-16-2016-00011European Structural and Investment Funds VEKOP-2.3.3-15-2016-00002National Research, Development and Innovation Fund Office, Hungary K-125100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The achievement of this work is that fine tuning of experimental and evaluation parameters can improve the absolute accuracy and reproducibility of selected area electron diffraction (SAED) to 0.1% without using internal standard. Due to the proposed procedure it was possible to reach a reproducibility better than 0.03% for camera length between sessions by careful control of specimen height and illumination conditions by monitoring lens currents. We applied a calibration specimen composed of nanocrystalline grains free of texture and providing narrow diffraction rings. Refinements of the centre of the diffraction pattern and corrections for elliptic ring distortions allowed for determining the ring diameters with an accuracy of 0.1%. We analyze the effect of different error sources and reason the achieved absolute accuracy of the measurement. Application of the proposed evaluation procedure is inevitable in case of multicomponent nanocomposites or textured materials and/or having close diffraction rings where application of automated procedures is limited. The achieved accuracy of 0.1% without internal standard is approaching that of routine laboratory XRD, and reduction of instrumental broadening due to the elaborated evaluation procedure allows for separation of close reflections, provides more reliable ring width and thus improved input parameters for further nanostructure analysis as demonstrated on dental enamel bioapatite.

Indexed as

ElectronsNanocompositesReproducibility of Resultsaberration corrected TEMbioapatiteevaluation procedureprecisionreproducibilitySAED

Identifiers

PMID36069159
PMCPMC10087671
OpenAlexW4294921316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.