Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069015›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Experimental and cross-cultural evidence that parenthood and parental care motives increase social conservatism.

Nicholas Kerry, Laith Al-Shawaf, Maria Barbato, Carlota Batres, Khandis R Blake, Youngjae Cha, Gregory V Chauvin, Jeremy D W Clifton, Ana Maria Fernandez, Andrzej Galbarczyk and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Social Conservatism and Family Vaues Regarding the Use of Pornography Among Romanians: A Moderated Mediation Model.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Nicholas KerryTulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7413-4691
Laith Al-ShawafUniversity of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Maria BarbatoUniversidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Carlota BatresFranklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, CA, USA.
Khandis R BlakeUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Youngjae ChaSeoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Gregory V ChauvinTulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jeremy D W CliftonUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ana Maria FernandezUniversidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-5891
Andrzej GalbarczykFaculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7879-9735
Maliki E GhossainyBoston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Dayk JangSeoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Grazyna JasienskaFaculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8716-6342
Minoru KarasawaNagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Lasse LaustsenAarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Riley LoriaTulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Francesca LubertiUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4673-8508
James MoranTulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Zoran PavlovićUniversity of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Michael Bang PetersenAarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Adam R SmithNagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Iris ŽeželjUniversity of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Damian R MurrayTulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7267-9102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in attitudes on social issues such as abortion, immigration and sex are hugely divisive, and understanding their origins is among the most important tasks facing human behavioural sciences. Despite the clear psychological importance of parenthood and the motivation to provide care for children, researchers have only recently begun investigating their influence on social and political attitudes. Because socially conservative values ostensibly prioritize safety, stability and family values, we hypothesized that being more invested in parental care might make socially conservative policies more appealing. Studies 1 (preregistered;

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonMotivationAttitudeChildFemaleHumansPoliticsPregnancySurveys and Questionnairesparental care motivationparenthoodpolitical attitudessocial conservatismWorld Values Survey

Identifiers

PMID36069015
PMCPMC9449478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.