ArticlePatient preference and adherence2022
Patient Preference for Self-Injection Devices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete Choice Experiment in China.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Health economic evaluation of self-injection of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a Japanese real-world web-based survey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The Adherence and Outcomes Benefits of Using a Connected, Reusable Auto-Injector for Self-Injecting Biologics: A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is increasingly treated with biologics, which is commonly administered by injection devices. The aim of this study is to evaluate patients' preferences for self-injection devices in RA, and to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) for injector devices in China. Methods: RA patients were recruited from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Chengdu, Wuhan and Xi'an in China. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was employed to elicit patient preferences. Patients were presented with 15 choice sets that consisted of seven attributes, which were developed based on literature review and further validated by physicians. The seven attributes were as follows: operation steps, injection pain, feedback indication, needle visibility, needle protection, size and out-of-pocket costs. A mixed logit model was used to analyze the relative importance of seven attributes and to calculate the WTP for a changed attribute level. Results: Analyses included 114 adults with RA (mean age of 44.6 years old). When choosing the injection device, all attributes had significant influence. Among nonmonetary attributes, very slight injection pain was the most preferred for patients, followed by auto-injection method, thicker size, hidden needle, with needle protection and multiple feedback indication. Patients had a negative preference for increasing out-of-pocket costs. Patients were willing to pay CNY 45.26 for improving slight injection pain to very slight injection pain, CNY 13.26 for the auto-injection method, CNY 12.22 for the thicker size, CNY 10.06 for the hidden needle, CNY 9.82 for needle protection, and CNY 9.70 for multiple feedback indicators. Conclusion: The results suggested that injection pain was the most important attribute for RA patients. Meanwhile, all other enhanced attributes of self-injection devices also significantly influence patients' selection on injection devices. Findings suggested that there is significant potential value in developing self-injection devices that could further help improve treatment adherence and promote patient-centered care in autoimmune diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.