Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068806›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2022

An optoacoustic imaging feature set to characterise blood vessels surrounding benign and malignant breast lesions.

O Abeyakoon, R Woitek, M G Wallis, P L Moyle, S Morscher, N Dahlhaus, S J Ford, N C Burton, R Manavaki, I A Mendichovszky and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optical and Optoacoustic Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  6. Advanced Image-Guidance and Surgical-Navigation Techniques for Real-Time Visualized Surgery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Efficient label-freePhotoacoustics · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

O AbeyakoonDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
R WoitekDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
M G WallisCambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
P L MoyleCambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
S MorscheriThera Medical GmbH, Zielstattstrasse 13, Munich 81379, Germany.
N DahlhausiThera Medical GmbH, Zielstattstrasse 13, Munich 81379, Germany.
S J FordiThera Medical GmbH, Zielstattstrasse 13, Munich 81379, Germany.
N C BurtoniThera Medical GmbH, Zielstattstrasse 13, Munich 81379, Germany.
R ManavakiDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
I A MendichovszkyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
J JosephDepartment of Physics, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK.
I Quiros-GonzalezDepartment of Physics, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK.
S E BohndiekDepartment of Physics, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK.
F J GilbertDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBiThera Medical (Germany) · DECambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16267Cancer Research UK 16465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining optoacoustic (OA) imaging with ultrasound (US) enables visualisation of functional blood vasculature in breast lesions by OA to be overlaid with the morphological information of US. Here, we develop a simple OA feature set to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. 94 female patients with benign, indeterminate or suspicious lesions were recruited and underwent OA-US. An OA-US imaging feature set was developed using images from the first 38 patients, which contained 14 malignant and 8 benign solid lesions. Two independent radiologists blindly scored the OA-US images of a further 56 patients, which included 31 malignant and 13 benign solid lesions, with a sensitivity of 96.8% and specificity of 84.6%. Our findings indicate that OA-US can reveal vascular patterns of breast lesions that indicate malignancy using a simple feature set based on single wavelength OA data, which is therefore amenable to application in low resource settings for breast cancer management.

Indexed as

Breast cancerHybrid imagingPhotoacoustic imagingUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36068806
PMCPMC9441264
OpenAlexW4283796479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.