Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068705›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Sulopenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.

Michael W Dunne, Steven I Aronin, Anita F Das, Karthik Akinapelli, Jeanne Breen, Michael T Zelasky, Sailaja Puttagunta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03357614 (Prospective, Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-center, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study of Efficacy, Tolerability & Safety of Sulopenem Followed by Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro for Treatment of cUTI in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03357614 phase3completednot on this map

Prospective, Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-center, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study of Efficacy, Tolerability & Safety of Sulopenem Followed by Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro for Treatment of cUTI in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorIterum Therapeutics, International LimitedRan2018 to 2019Enrolled1,395ConditionsComplicated Urinary Tract InfectionsArmsSulopenem, Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid, Ertapenem, Ciprofloxacin, Amoxicillin-clavulanate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of data on the resistance of uropathogens to sulopenem.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Therapeutic strategies for multi-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  7. What's Hot This Year in ID Clinical Science 2025.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  8. The oral penems and carbapenems.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. What's Hot This Year in Infectious Diseases Clinical Science.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Applying Desirability of Outcome Ranking End Points.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Applying Desirability of Outcome Ranking End Point to Randomized Trial of Sulopenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael W DunneIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6186-5196
Steven I AroninIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.
Anita F DasDas Statistical Consulting, Guerneville, California, USA.
Karthik AkinapelliTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeanne BreenIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.
Michael T ZelaskyJohnson & Johnson, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Sailaja PuttaguntaIterum Therapeutics, Old Saybrook, Connecticut, USA.
Fulcrum Therapeutics (United States) · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USTakeda (United States) · USWest County Health Centers · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSulopenem is a thiopenem antibiotic being developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections. The availability of both intravenous (IV) and oral formulations will facilitate earlier hospital discharge.

methodsHospitalized adults with pyuria, bacteriuria, and signs and symptoms of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) were randomized to 5 days of IV sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid or 5 days of IV ertapenem followed by oral ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin-clavulanate, depending on uropathogen susceptibility. The primary end point was overall combined clinical and microbiologic response at the test-of-cure visit (day 21).

resultsOf 1392 treated patients, 444 and 440 treated with sulopenem and ertapenem, respectively, had a positive baseline urine culture and were eligible for the primary efficacy analyses. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organisms were identified in 26.6% of patients and fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible pathogens in 38.6%. For the primary end point, noninferiority of sulopenem to the comparator regimen was not demonstrated, 67.8% vs 73.9% (difference, -6.1%; 95% confidence interval, -12.0 to -.1%). The difference was driven by a lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the subgroup of ertapenem-treated patients who stepped down to ciprofloxacin. No substantial difference in overall response was observed at any other time point. Both IV and oral formulations of sulopenem were well-tolerated and compared favorably to the comparator.

conclusionsSulopenem followed by oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid was not noninferior to ertapenem followed by oral step-down therapy for the treatment of cUTIs, driven by a lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in those who received ciprofloxacin. Both formulations of sulopenem were well-tolerated. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03357614.

Indexed as

BacteriuriaPyelonephritisUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinErtapenemHumansLactamsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinErtapenemLactamssulopenemacute pyelonephritiscomplicated urinary tract infectionsulopenem

Identifiers

PMID36068705
PMCPMC9825827
OpenAlexW4297613952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.