Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068667›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

ENACT study: What has helped health and social care workers maintain their mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Nicola Cogan, Chloe Kennedy, Zoe Beck, Lisa McInnes, Gillian MacIntyre, Liza Morton, Gary Tanner, Jacek Kolacz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola CoganSchool of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Chloe KennedySchool of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Zoe BeckSchool of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Lisa McInnesSchool of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Gillian MacIntyreSchool of Social Work & Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Liza MortonSchool of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Gary TannerSchool of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Jacek KolaczTraumatic Stress Research Consortium (TSRC), Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
University of Strathclyde · GBIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of research has highlighted the adverse impact of COVID-19 stressors on health and social care workers' (HSCWs) mental health. Complementing this work, we report on the psychosocial factors that have had both a positive and negative impact on the mental well-being of HSCWs during the third lockdown period in Scotland. Using a cross-sectional design, participants (n = 1364) completed an online survey providing quantitative data and free open-text responses. A multi-method approach to analysis was used. The majority of HSCWs were found to have low well-being scores, high levels of COVID-19 stress, worry, burnout and risk perception scores and almost half of HSCWs met the clinical cut-off for acute stress (indicative of PTSD). HSCWs with higher scores on adaptive coping strategies and team resilience reported higher scores on mental well-being. HSCWs were significantly more likely to seek informal support for dealing with personal or emotional problems compared to formal supports. Barriers to formal help-seeking were identified including stigma and fear of the consequences of disclosure. HSCWs mostly valued peer support, workplace supports, visible leadership and teamwork in maintaining their mental well-being. Our findings illuminate the complexity of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on HSCWs' well-being and will inform future intervention development seeking to increase positive adaptation and improve staff well-being. Addressing barriers to mental health help-seeking among HSCWs is essential. The implications emphasise the importance of lessons learned across health and social care contexts, planning and preparedness for future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthSocial SupportadaptationCOVID-19health and social care workershelp-seekingmental healthpeer supportwell-being

Identifiers

PMID36068667
PMCPMC9539329
OpenAlexW4294945999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.