ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022
ENACT study: What has helped health and social care workers maintain their mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organisational readiness and preparedness for trauma-informed practice across UK frontline services: a mixed-methods study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- The Development and Protocol for Testing a Co-Created Digital Intervention (Sentinel) to Improve Mental Well-Being and Help Manage and Prevent Trauma in First Responders.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Psychological Safety as a Predictor of Acute Stress, Well-Being and Burnout in Health and Social Care Workers: A Predictive Correlational Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Persistent Traumatic Stress Exposure: Rethinking PTSD for Frontline Workers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuroception of psychological safety scale (NPSS): validation with a UK based adult community sample.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- 'I've got no PPE to protect my mind': understanding the needs and experiences of first responders exposed to trauma in the workplace.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2024Article
- Risk and protection factors of mental stress among medical staff in the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Editorial: From individual to collective: bridging the gap between clinical practice and public policies.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Article
- Rarecare: A policy perspective on the burden of rare diseases on caregivers in Latin America.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- ENACT study: What has helped health and social care workers maintain their mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic?Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Randomized controlled trial of emotion-focused training for helping professionals.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing body of research has highlighted the adverse impact of COVID-19 stressors on health and social care workers' (HSCWs) mental health. Complementing this work, we report on the psychosocial factors that have had both a positive and negative impact on the mental well-being of HSCWs during the third lockdown period in Scotland. Using a cross-sectional design, participants (n = 1364) completed an online survey providing quantitative data and free open-text responses. A multi-method approach to analysis was used. The majority of HSCWs were found to have low well-being scores, high levels of COVID-19 stress, worry, burnout and risk perception scores and almost half of HSCWs met the clinical cut-off for acute stress (indicative of PTSD). HSCWs with higher scores on adaptive coping strategies and team resilience reported higher scores on mental well-being. HSCWs were significantly more likely to seek informal support for dealing with personal or emotional problems compared to formal supports. Barriers to formal help-seeking were identified including stigma and fear of the consequences of disclosure. HSCWs mostly valued peer support, workplace supports, visible leadership and teamwork in maintaining their mental well-being. Our findings illuminate the complexity of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on HSCWs' well-being and will inform future intervention development seeking to increase positive adaptation and improve staff well-being. Addressing barriers to mental health help-seeking among HSCWs is essential. The implications emphasise the importance of lessons learned across health and social care contexts, planning and preparedness for future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.