Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068661›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of social psychology2023

Self-enhancement and physical health: A meta-analysis.

Constantine Sedikides

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of social psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Self-enhancement and physical health: A meta-analysis.The British journal of social psychology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Corrigendum.The British journal of social psychology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Constantine SedikidesUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prior meta-analysis yielded a positive relation between self-enhancement and psychological health. This article presents the first meta-analysis of the association between self-enhancement and physical health (k = 87; N = 22,415). The meta-analysis relied predominantly on social desirability as an operationalization of self-enhancement and secondarily on comparative judgement and narcissism. Further, the meta-analysis operationalized physical health in terms of self-rated health, symptoms and biomarkers. Overall, self-enhancement yielded a near-zero association with physical health, r = .01. However, this association was more pronounced for comparative judgement (r = .18, k = 6) than social desirability (r = .03, k = 41) or narcissism (r = -.0001, k = 8), and for self-rated health (r = .09, k = 9) than symptoms (r = .01, k = 29) or biomarkers (r = -.13, k = 17). The association between self-enhancement and physical health fluctuates across measures of both constructs calling for more focussed and nuanced investigations.

Indexed as

Health StatusSelf CareDiagnostic Self EvaluationHumansNarcissismSocial ComparisonSocial Desirabilitycomparative judgementhealthnarcissismphysical healthself-enhancement

Identifiers

PMID36068661
PMCPMC10087604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.