Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068508›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2022

Realist analysis of whether emergency departments with primary care services generate 'provider-induced demand'.

I J McFadzean, M Edwards, F Davies, A Cooper, D Price, A Carson-Stevens, J Dale, T Hughes, A Porter, B Harrington and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

I J McFadzeanDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales. mcfadzeanj@cardiff.ac.uk.
M EdwardsDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales. edwardsm28@cardiff.ac.uk.
F DaviesPRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales.
A CooperPRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales.
D PricePRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales.
A Carson-StevensPRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales.
J DaleUnit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
T HughesJohn Radcliff Hospital, Oxford, UK.
A PorterSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales.
B HarringtonPRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales.
B EvansSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales.
N SiriwardenaSchool of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
P AndersonSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales.
A EdwardsPRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales.
Cardiff University · GBSwansea University · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Lincoln · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not known whether emergency departments (EDs) with primary care services influence demand for non-urgent care ('provider-induced demand'). We proposed that distinct primary care services in EDs encourages primary care demand, whereas primary care integrated within EDs may be less likely to cause additional demand. We aimed to explore this and explain contexts (C), mechanisms (M) and outcomes (O) influencing demand.

methodsWe used realist evaluation methodology and observed ED service delivery. Twenty-four patients and 106 staff members (including Clinical Directors and General Practitioners) were interviewed at 13 EDs in England and Wales (240 hours of observations across 30 days). Field notes from observations and interviews were analysed by creating 'CMO' configurations to develop and refine theories relating to drivers of demand.

resultsEDs with distinct primary care services were perceived to attract demand for primary care because services were visible, known or enabled direct access to health care services. Other influencing factors included patients' experiences of accessing primary care, community care capacity, service design and population characteristics.

conclusionsPatient, local-system and wider-system factors can contribute to additional demand at EDs that include primary care services. Our findings can inform service providers and policymakers in developing strategies to limit the effect of potential influences on additional demand when demand exceeds capacity.

Indexed as

General PractitionersInduced DemandEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandHumansPrimary Health CareCapacityEmergency departmentPrimary care servicesProvider- induced demandRealist evaluationService delivery

Identifiers

PMID36068508
PMCPMC9450363
OpenAlexW4294762679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.